this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
86 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

42732 readers
435 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not a lawyer, but if this isn't a clear case of duress, then nothing is. Nobody with a functioning brain would say that someone begging a service to stop publishing generated sexual imagery of them is doing so under anything other than duress. That claim would be equivalent to saying someone agreed to your TOS when they begged you to stop stabbing their mother on your service.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but US courts give TOS insane leeway.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

US "courts". (Their words, not mine)

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago

have we considered flooding the internet with xai porn of lindsay graham blowing elon? trump’s clinton bj? stills of the recording of the russian pee tape? amy coney barrett pulling her g-string open so ted cruz can slip a dollar in?