Why is it that hard to break away from big tech? Start with Microsoft - their software gets worse every year... At this point I wouldn't be surprised if they're just selling copilot slop
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
103 points (96.4% liked)
Linux
61200 readers
441 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Because they literally wrote the book on lock-in https://fabien.benetou.fr/ReadingNotes/InformationRules and they tried with all their might to stop free software https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Open_Letter_to_Hobbyists so beside the money and power they have been strategically at it for decades. Dependency is deep in the product.
The worst part is that people still buy their shit instead of laughing them out of existence.
As a Dane, this has been frightening for years. I hope our government thinks of open source solutions, instead of just a european company over a US one.
instead of just a european company over a US one
even this is an improvement
As a unitedstatesian engineer, reading stories about escaping the infuriating (and now, very obviously caustic and manipulative) US monopoly on tech infrastructure companies makes me want to move to the EU and help break the monopoly on that shit. There are other things that make me want to move too, but the opportunity to build some real alternatives that diminish US hegemony over… well, everything, is frankly more than a bit enticing.
Please feel free to help right now. You can still move to the EU if you want to but if you take for example NLNet they fund open source work for anybody anywhere in the World, you "just" have to propose something that is new and needed with a focus on the Internet.
so.. you're the baddies?
I’m saying I want to make a difference by helping to break the hegemony the country I was born in has on the world. I dare say the only people who would call that a bad thing are specifically the sort of people I absolutely fucking detest in this place.
it's coming from a well known meme: "are we the baddies".
You should look it up. It's basically 2 Nazis wondering, and then realizing they are the baddies...
Mitchell and Webb.
"Have you noticed that our caps have actually got little pictures of skulls on them?"
I don't really get why and how lobbies are even allowed.
I always thought the correct word to describe it was "corruption" and that it was illegal.
Corruption is when you get a million for something. Lobbying is when you do it for a promise to be on the board of directors in the future.
Welcome to capitalism, where stuff like this is only illegal in socialist countries.
Like... Denmark? Where it's legal?
Of course, our socialist ruling party in Norway recently had several former ministers join various lobbies lately, so there's that too. Not illegal, though.
Denmark is capitalist, so yeah of course I'd be legal.
The US is capitalistic. Most of Europe is some variation of social democratic, with us up in the Nordics more socialist than further down on the continent.
Yes, capitalistic values increasingly and intrusively are corroding functioning societies towards a more US style dysfunction, but we are still far from as lost a case, so there is still hope.
And lobbyism has been regularly discussed in the last decade and will hopefully at least get stronger regulation sooner rather than later for several of us, so there is hope for that part at least.
I see you subscribe to the "socialism is when the government does stuff" school of thought, I disagree with that and think Denmark is social democratic and therefore capitalist.
Social Democracy is a method of operating the government.
Capitalism is a way of operating the economy.
Much of Europe's governments are classified as a Social Democracy and they also use the capitalist economic system.
Thank you. This is the way. Differentiations hard to see from the outside, apparently.
Welcome to Lemmy, where 'socialist countries' means nations that follow Marxist-Leninism and not a form of modern utopian socialism better known as social democracy that took bits and pieces of Marxist-Leninism under a capitalist umbrella.
So not like Denmark, but like China or Vietnam.
That's an extreme USian way of viewing it. Not saying you're wrong, 'cause I've observed the same. But @FauxLiving@lemmy.world worded reality really well in a comment just above.
The USian way of viewing socialism is "centre-right liberalism + religious democratics + social liberalism + social democracy + democratic socialism + marxist leninism" = socialism
Exactly, and socialism and communism are two words meaning the same.
It's lobbying in the West and Euro subsidies embezzlement in the East.
I'd choose the second option tbh. I'd rather yoink some funds than take a bribe.
All I can say is Nothing new on the western front. Same shit all the time.