this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
121 points (100.0% liked)

politics

27195 readers
2117 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Representatives Ro Khanna, a California Democrat, and Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, have asked a federal judge to appoint a "special master and independent monitor" to oversee the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) release of its files on Jeffrey Epstein.

In a letter to U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer dated Thursday, the lawmakers said the DOJ had failed to meet the requirements of the Epstein Files Transparency Act “in multiple respects," including failing to meet a December 19 deadline to release all the files.

"As the leads of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, we have urgent and grave concerns about DOJ’s failure to comply with the Act as well as the Department’s violations of this Court’s order,” they wrote.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

Why is everyone slow playing everything with this clown show? They were legally required to release all the files two weeks ago. Where are the consequences for refusing to comply with a court order? Why bother issuing orders at all if compliance is optional?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 16 hours ago

Why is everyone slow playing everything with this clown show

Because the "justice" system was designed specifically for rich and powerful crooks to get away with whatever as long as they throw their weight around enough.

Actually holding them or even their goons accountable while they control ANY of the government apparatus is an uphill battle.

Doing so while they have a stranglehold on EVERY branch of the federal government and are mask off about their fascist intent as well as how much they ACTUALLY care about state's rights? That's gonna be glacial even if you DON'T have overly cautious conservatives like Mueller and Biden leading the effort.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 16 hours ago

I agree. I searched for an answer on that around that time, but I don't think anyone is reporting on it if there is even anything happening. The media is not on our side.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago

Stop protecting this snuff film making bone spurred pedophile.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I saw trump talking about tariffs, so I looked for something he was trying to hide. I always try Epstein shit first, because that's usually it. He's really fighting the files being released. What's the reason trump?

[–] londos@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago