this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
158 points (98.2% liked)

memes

18912 readers
2767 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 2 points 2 hours ago

More Holes = Less Density

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 17 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

The reason this doesn't work is because the "more" amd "less" competitors work on different things entirely. These are not mathematically correct statements in any way.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The sequence is completely correct until the point it decides that more ◦ less ≡ less.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 30 minutes ago

Yes. But it would be more correct to include what the "more" and "less" are comparing to so that it would be immediately obvious why the last sentences is wrong.

[–] At7889@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I think this is more so implying if-then statements rather than a literal mathematical representation:

If there is more cheese, then there is more holes. If there is more holes, then there is less cheese. Therefore, if there is more cheese, then there is less cheese.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The assumption that cheese has holes is not true. Many times I come home with cheese with no holes.

[–] At7889@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yup! The first premise is wrong, since there is plenty of cheese without holes—meaning that more cheese does not imply or equal to more holes.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Can’t imagine the weight of air inside the holes is significant compared to the weight of cheese; taking a glance at the numbers, cheese is 800-900x more dense than air. Given cheese is sold by weight, more holes = very slightly less cheese, practically negligible.

Now I’m curious about how much space a block of 99% holes cheese would occupy. Maybe something like aerocheese, with a whole bunch of microscopic air bubbles throughout.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 5 hours ago

Also wrong. There's an implied "than <other object>". For the first one it's "than a smaller piece of cheese with the same ratio of holes" and the second is "than a piece of cheese of the same size".

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago

The amount of cheese is the same

The holes just inflate it

Just like when you blow air into a balloon.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Checkmate Wisconsinites

[–] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Why so vaguely threatening? I just want to talk. Five minutes alone.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

More holes = less cheese is the error.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

More cheese = more holes is the error. Since the type of cheese isn't specified, it would only apply to a small number of cheeses.

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There is a cheese where the production got so good that they had no holes anymore so they added something to the cheese to get the "typical" holes back XD        

But sadly forgot which cheese it was exactlf

[–] qupada@fedia.io 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TheYojimbo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

That was interesting thanks !

[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

As the prophet Les McCann said, "Compared to what?"