People seemingly love blaming others for their problems so they can avoid saying "well, maybe we're the problem. This is called "unifying the nation against an external enemy" and it shouldn't work this well, but it does. Russia was picked out as a target because it allows 2-in-1: unify the country against an external enemy, to present oneself as the "strong protector of home" and also distract from internal problems, but also attack the East at the same time.
Lefty Memes
An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.
Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.
If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.
Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!
Rules
0. Only post socialist memes
That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)
0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility
(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)
We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.
We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.
When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.
0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms
When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart
- ofc => OFC
- af = AF
- ok => OK
- lol => LOL
- bc => BC
- bs => BS
- iirc => IIRC
- cia => CIA
- nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
- usa => USA
- prc => PRC
- etc.
Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them
1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here
Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.
2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such
That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.
3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.
That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).
4. No Bigotry.
The only dangerous minority is the rich.
5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.
(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)
6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.
Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.
- Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:
- Racism
- Sexism
- Queerphobia
- Ableism
- Classism
- Sexual assault
- Genocide/ethnic cleansing or (mass) deportations
- Fascism
- (National) chauvinism
- Orientalism
- Colonialism or Imperialism (and their neo- counterparts)
- Zionism
- Religious fundamentalism of any kind
My favorite is when conservative New Yorkers react to progressive street designs with "This isn't Amsterdam!" Bitch this is literally New Amsterdam and it was literally Dutch and why do you think it's called Canal Street?? Exclaiming that their modern global home of capitalism isn't anything like the actual birthplace of capitalism all because they want to see bicycles.
Conservative New Yorkers are so stupid, how does one live in the most expensive city in the US and not embrace socialism? Personally I think Mamdani is compromise, we need real socialism.
America: does the most American shit ever*
Americans: Russia made us do this!!
I mean, you could make the same statement about Russia in reverse and it would also be true. Idk how much it's done by China, I'd assume there's some of it but I haven't seen it much.
Russia really likes blaming the West tho lol, as much if not more then the West like blaming Russia/China
Maybe that has to do with the west making it their primary goal in the 40's-90's to sink the Union that was capable of providing good living to it's people and replace it with a balkanized federation run by oligarchs where a woman's only stable job was prostitution.
Americans, when other Americans are being authoritarian: "What are we, a bunch of Asians?"
American shitlibs when they see corruption: Wow I thought only people with dark skin do that
Whenever I hear Americans say this, I mentally translate it to Honest English by replacing whatever comes in the position of the noun with "untermenschen".

East authoritarian countries used stupidity of Western "free market" liberals, and we're where we're.
Right everyone is open with the fact that a lot of far right wing movements in Europe are founded by Russia. They are trying to do what mostly west did in the middle east decades ago. Put a lot of money into far right nationalist religious movements, and see how cultures are collapsing.
Russia didn't found those groups. They find existing dissidents, give them funding, and amplify their online footprints. They really don't care if they are left, right, or center, as long as they are pissed off and not terribly bright. Tankies of clansmen work just as well.
You're saying, that giving very hard and addictive drugs to person in a crisis, isn't creating very high rise in addicted people?
They find the crisis, and push narrative, that it's fault of LGBT people, or the immigrants, or people with different skin color, or different religion. Everyone who is not following what exactly state wants (skin color, religion, nation).
They really don’t care if they are left, right, or center, as long as they are pissed off and not terribly bright.
Not true. It's better to push right wing agenda, since russia has nothing to do with socialism, but it's a full on right wing authoritarian regime. Then, before Russia attacked Ukraine, a lot of right wing populists were saying that Russia is a right wing alternative for rotten west.
Of course, there are many tankies and other shit, just to destroy the left. A lot of forums in the west, like on reddit (or on lemmy, like "memes") will ban you for mentioning russian imperialism, or Katyn genocide.
First authoritarian is a useless buzzword.
Second Europe and the west has had an issue with far right freaks for centuries. Regan, Thatcher, The Nazis, and the list goes on and on. Putting all the blame on Russia is not only wrong it's just infantile bullshit.
Putin and Russian far right nationalist authoritarian Regime is a product of west. His regime is no different from Netanjahu's.
Also Russia is a victim of this oppressive regime. There's no democracy, no free press, no freedom, then regular people are also victims.
And I'm not saying that Russia is the only one to blame, but before trump, Russia was the one who was pushing a lot of far right wing agenda to destroy Europe. For some reasons trump don't like strong countries in south from them, and Putin's regime don't want strong Europe.
You are replacing real analysis with a boogeyman handed to you by Western media. That is the core problem here. The far right in Europe is not the result of Russian influence. It is the direct outcome of decades of neoliberal restructuring. Deindustrialization wiped out working class jobs. Austerity destroyed social services. Housing became financialized. Wages stagnated while productivity rose. Social democracy collapsed after fully integrating into neoliberal capitalism. When liberal parties administer capitalist crisis, fascists fill the vacuum. That is not theory. That is observable history. The EU itself is a machine for producing reaction. It enforces privatization, bans state planning, attacks labor unions, suppresses national development, and subordinates weaker economies to German and French capital. Greece was economically strangled in full public view. Southern and Eastern Europe were reduced to cheap labor pools. This is what radicalized people, not Russian Telegram posts. In the United States the situation is even clearer. The US state has backed far right extremists for nearly a century. Nazi collaborators were absorbed and given prestigious positions through Operation Paperclip. Anti communist fascists were installed across Latin America. Death squads in El Salvador and Guatemala were trained by the US. Apartheid South Africa was supported until the very end. The Mujahideen were funded and armed, directly creating modern jihadism. None of this was hidden. It was official policy. NATO itself was built by integrating former fascists across Europe as long as they were anti communist. This is documented history. The so called liberal order has never opposed fascism. It opposes threats to capital. When fascists serve capital, they are tolerated or funded. Even today the West openly arms far right formations when geopolitically useful. Ukraine is the most obvious example, where ultra nationalist militias were integrated into state forces with full NATO support. No one in Brussels suddenly discovered a moral objection to extremism then. So the idea that Russia uniquely “pushes far right ideology” while the West defends democracy is fantasy. The far right does not rise because people are tricked by foreign propaganda. It rises because capitalism is failing to reproduce social stability. This obsession with Russian interference serves one purpose only. It shifts blame away from Western ruling classes. It turns systemic crisis into an external conspiracy. It tells people that nothing is structurally wrong with capitalism, the EU, or US empire. The problem is always an outsider. That is not analysis. Russia today is not socialist. It is not progressive. It is a capitalist state formed out of imperial collapse. Its actions are driven by security and market interests, the same as any other capitalist power. Treating it as the prime engine of global fascism is analytically unserious. Fascism is not imported. It is produced internally when capitalism enters decay. If Russia vanished tomorrow, Europe would still face collapsing living standards, demographic crisis, housing shortages, declining energy security, and an economic model that no longer works. Those conditions would still generate reaction. Blaming Russia is comforting because it avoids the real conclusion. The crisis is not geopolitical. It is systemic.
Dude, you're repeating Russian propaganda over and over.
West the same way as Russia is a victim of neoliberalism. When soviet union collapsed due to keeping the power in the hands of the same people for way too long, then neoliberalism kicked in the same way as in whole Europe.
Transformation in the east block created many oligarchs, oligarchs choose who will rule, and they support far right as much as possible.
And when western Europe choose democracy, because cold war pushed west governments to create middle class, east block people never had this opportunity. Easy block collapsed, all the goods, factories and so one, instead of being given to regural people, was stolen by the rulling class. I'm from Poland, so this is exact what happened. And then right authoritarian regime in Russia start to blame minorities like LGBT people for situation in country.
And then years after, west countries were fighting and winnings things like keeping high social benefits and winning rights for minorities, countries like Russia was way behind. Keeping power in a hands of rulling class, oligarchs, like in Russia or Ukraine. Always leads to collapse.
One of the ways for Russia to gain more power is to weakening Europe. Oligarchs and rulling class in Russia is not going to let go, they are living like tzar family when regular people are starving. They need weak and broken Europe to at least have some power in region. In Europe no one wants to be ally of Russian far right wing regime.
Btw Russia is not progressive, it's a right wing authoritarian regime that is trying to replicate tzar imperium times, with oligarchs on top. And regular people on the bottom. With hated for anyone who is different.
I wish for Russia to have revolution again, so normal people could get the power, and oligarchs will be you know where
Just to clarify a few thing I don't support Russia beyond them a pole against us imperialism at this current time. I also never claimed they were progressive please stop strawmanning me you shitlib loser and try engage with what I'm actually saying.
All that being said, you are reciting liberal mythology and pretending it has any weight as serious analysis. “Russian propaganda” is doing all the intellectual labor for you. You invoke it whenever reality contradicts the story you were taught. It just goes to show how deeply invested in western chauvanism you are. You keep pretending the West is some fellow victim of neoliberalism alongside Russia. That is absurd. Western Europe and the US were not passive sufferers. They were the architects and beneficiaries of neoliberalism. IMF structural adjustment, World Bank debt traps, privatization schemes, EU accession shocks, and global financial domination were imposed by Western capital on the rest of the world. Russia and Eastern Europe were looted. The Global South was super exploited. Western corporations made record profits. Your welfare states did not fall from the sky because “democracy was chosen.” They were built on imperial extraction. Western Europe funded its middle class through the super exploitation of Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the periphery. Cheap resources, stolen labor, unequal exchange, and military domination paid for your social benefits. When that imperial margin began shrinking, austerity became the name of the game. That alone proves it was never moral capitalism. It was imperial rent-sharing. Social democracy that you seem to hold in such high regard is not socialism. It is capitalism bribing one section of workers with wealth extracted from the rest of the world. That is why your welfare collapsed the moment the USSR fell and anti-imperialist movements were crushed. The money stopped flowing. So the mask came off. You keep saying oligarchs controlling society leads to collapse. Correct. That is capitalism. Not “Russian authoritarian culture.” Capital accumulation produces oligarchy everywhere. The US has oligarchs. Germany has oligarchs. Poland has oligarchs. Elections do not remove them because capital owns the economy before voting even begins. Calling Western capitalism “democracy” and Eastern capitalism “authoritarianism” is childish. You talk about minorities as if hatred originates from Russian propaganda. No. Reaction grows when material security collapses. People turn toward nationalism when housing, wages, healthcare, and stability disappear. Liberal identity rhetoric cannot substitute for bread. When capitalism fails to reproduce life, fascism appears. This is basic historical materialism. You also keep pretending Russia is some unique imperial monster trying to resurrect the tsar. Meanwhile the US maintains 800 military bases, sanctions half the planet, invades countries openly, and dictates economic policy across continents. But somehow Russia is the singular threat to world stability. That belief did not come from analysis. It came from Western media saturation. You are angry at oligarchs yet defend the system that produces them. You want revolution in Russia while defending the same capitalist structure in Europe that would crush such a revolution instantly if it ever threatened property relations. That contradiction is not accidental. It is social democracy. Social democracy is not the alternative to fascism. It is its moderate wing. It preserves capitalism during stability and collapses into repression when crisis returns. Historically, social democrats disarmed the working class, defended private property, and handed power to fascists rather than allow socialist transformation. Germany already taught this lesson once. You are not describing material reality. You are repeating the moral language of the empire. You replaced dialectical materialism with NATO talking points and think that makes you progressive. The far right is not rising because Russians whispered in Europe’s ear. It is rising because capitalism is decaying, imperial privilege is shrinking, and liberalism has nothing left to offer but blame. Until you confront that, you will keep chasing villains abroad while fascism grows at home.
Just to clarify a few thing I don’t support Russia beyond them a pole against us imperialism at this current time.
Sorry, can you elaborate? I dont want to say, that you're justifying one imperialism by other one. My english is not perfect as you can see, so please elaborate.
I also never claimed they were progressive
Ok, i can see it now, you wrote that it's not progressive, my apologies.
you shitlib
Please be civil, and dont call me a lib. That would be nice.
“Russian propaganda” is doing all the intellectual labor for you.
I just stated fact that russia is one of the supporters of far right wing politics in the west, and that they are paying a lot for it.
You can find a lot of evidence of it. Like https://www.abc.net.au/education/how-us-youtubers-were-paid-to-spread-propaganda/104390822, https://www.euronews.com/2024/09/05/american-right-wing-influencers-duped-to-work-for-covert-russian-influence-operation-us-sa, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/may/10/us-far-right-groups-russia-links, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/13/us/politics/russia-election-interference.html,
If you don't like these articles, and want more, here you have more, with photos and proof that russia was inviting and organizing far right meetings: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32009360, https://newlinesmag.com/reportage/exclusive-russia-backs-europes-far-right/
It just goes to show how deeply invested in western chauvanism you are.
Please, stop with your russian propaganda. Do you need more evidences? Stop pretending that russia is not funding far right movements in europe or USA.
You keep pretending the West is some fellow victim of neoliberalism alongside Russia. That is absurd.
Then explain to me, why russia is not a victim of neoliberalism after collapse of east block? What is your statement?
Western Europe and the US were not passive sufferers.
Are you talking about oligarch groups, and things like Bildberg group, that russia is actual part of? It's funny, that you skipped very controversial groups that russia is a part of. Maybe we can talk about G20? Also why you didn't say, who (russia) applied to IMF in 1991?
Noeliberalism was born in the two countries. So based of your statement, we can say, than all other countries are a victims of these two? Can you see what's the problem? Oligarchs. They are the ones, that are pushing us toward "free" market economy.
Also, why are you blaming post soviet countries for neoliberalism? You know, that for us (I'm from Poland) people hated so much being slave to soviets, that we choose to join west? And as you can see, especially after joining UE, we're right now way richer than any other post soviet country that didn't join UE.
EU accession shocks, and global financial domination
So, if the economic growth is something wrong, why russia is also trying to regain economic power after collapse of soviet union, and why China is doing the same thing and it's way more efficient than west? Are you also going to blame china for getting a lot of financial domination over rest of the world?
The Global South was super exploited.
True. And this is still going on now.
Western corporations made record profits.
Why are you skipping part about China and soviet role? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/9/6/as-china-africa-woo-each-other-who-gains-more-its-complex-say-experts https://africacenter.org/spotlight/china-africa-critical-minerals/ https://theconversation.com/maps-showing-chinas-growing-influence-in-africa-distort-reality-but-some-risks-are-real-249454
And we can talk about cold war era, where USA was supporting one side of the conflict, and soviets the other one, destabilizing the region more and more.
And why are you not talking about soviets exploitation of east block countries? Oh no, it doesn't fit your agenda? So bad. Or we can go deeper. Can you remember why revolution started in Russia? Why tzar was killed? Because Russia was exploiting their own citizens so much, that they decided to kill elites, and this made their life better (i think that with this one you can agree?).
I'm not saying that west is good, I'm just saying, that all types of imperialism is bad, no matter where it comes, is it china, russia, usa or Europe.
Social democracy that you seem to hold in such high regard is not socialism.
Please stop lying. No straw man arguments, no lies. Maybe you didn't understood what i wrote, so let's go back and see
Still social democracy is way better and way more socialist than state capitalism.
And in other post i agreed with statement, than in Spain they were able to establish anarchist region, and i liked that, i supported, and it was good. So this is the closest to my political views. I'm anti authoritarian, anti imperialistic. Do i support social democracy? I prefer other solutions, but still if i have to choose, Norway is way better and way more socialist than state capitalism in china.
That is why your welfare collapsed
Please stop lying, and stop with the straw man arguments and ad personam. OK? I'm not oligarch, I'm not russian oil billionaire, or USA tech bro.
As i wrote in one of the comments, west won the cold war, because they understood that, to prevent socialist revolution, they need middle class to exist. After soviet collapse, and russia turning in to another capitalist country, and china switching in to state capitalism, there is no real socialist movement in the world, so no one cares about the revolution.
The money stopped flowing. So the mask came off. You keep saying oligarchs controlling society leads to collapse. Correct. That is capitalism.
That is any system, where all the power is held in hands of small group of people. That's why monarchies, feudalism, and soviet union collapsed, that's why people started revolutions.
I can give you example, Poland. Polish WORKERS, working class people, started revolution to stop authoritarian government that was subordinate to soviets. Workers fought against "working class" party, that held the power for so many decades, and stop giving shit about workers. And this was common at the end of east block.
Can we say, that this was fault of capitalism? If you want to say, that authoritarian regime pretending to be working class, was a capitalism, go ahead.
Calling Western capitalism “democracy” and Eastern capitalism “authoritarianism” is childish. You talk about minorities as if hatred originates from Russian propaganda.
One again, why are you lying? There are also authoritarian countries in the west, currently USA is turning in to authoritarian country. Stop with the straw man arguments.
You talk about minorities as if hatred originates from Russian propaganda.
Of course that russia paying for the homophobic organizations, and supporting them way more than catholic church, is responsible for homophobia.
This is basic historical materialism. You also keep pretending Russia is some unique imperial monster trying to resurrect the tsar.
Stop lying, OK? No more straw arguments. Again, is it unique? No. Is it only imperialism? No. Is it the only big country that had tsar? Probably yes.
But somehow Russia is the singular threat to world stability.
Dude, grow up. Today we have two opposite sides, China and USA. Somewhere there there is also UE and Japan. Stop pretending that nowadays russia is some kind of super power. It's not. Germany is a bigger alternative for USA, than ruSSia.
Historically, social democrats disarmed the
And water is wet. Why are you creating strawman arguments, pretending that I'm somehow big fan of social democracy? I said it, it's better than state capitalism, but there are better options. Social democracy is not something that we should aim, we need more direct democracy and more power in a hands of regular people, so state is working for the people, not for the oligarchs. You can call it socialism, you can call it anarchism, and so on.
And now it's a special round of your lies:
You want revolution in Russia while defending the same capitalist structure in Europe that would crush such a revolution instantly if it ever threatened property relations.
Stop lying. I never said that.
You are repeating the moral language of the empire.
More lies, of someone who is pretending that the most imperialistic and antiworker and antihuman country in europe, russia, some kind of alternative that we should support.
You replaced dialectical materialism with NATO talking points and think that makes you progressive.
One more lie. Where did you find out that i love nato? Someone lied to you. Only reason why NATO was created, was east block being so united, and working so close, so the west wanted to have similar military cooperation.
And in the end, east block collapse, because the same people were on the top for way too long.
Until you confront that, you will keep chasing villains abroad while fascism grows at home.
More straw man arguments, and skipping the facts. So sad.
You know what's is sad? That i would like to have some socialist alternative to west. so USA and UE would invest way more in to the middle class, and living standards.
This reply perfectly demonstrates the problem. You do not actually understand imperialism, so every time the argument moves into political economy you retreat into vibes, NGO articles, and moral equivalence.
You keep flooding links about Russia funding far-right groups as if anyone denied that. No one did. The point you keep dodging is causality. Funding does not create fascism. It exploits conditions that already exist. Capitalist crisis creates fascism. Foreign money only rides the wave. You are confusing acceleration with origin.
If Russian money alone created fascism, then far-right movements would not have existed before 2014. They did. They existed long before Putin was president. They surged hardest after austerity, privatization, housing collapse, labor precarity, and social-democratic betrayal. That is material causation. Your articles do not refute that.
What you are doing is substituting investigation with courtroom rhetoric. “Here are some links” is not analysis.
You still do not understand what imperialism is.
Imperialism is not “any country with power.” It is a system of global capital accumulation where monopoly finance capital extracts surplus value from the periphery through unequal exchange, debt regimes, trade control, sanctions, and military enforcement. Lenin defined this over 100 years ago. Russia does not control global finance, shipping lanes, reserve currency, payment systems, or international lending institutions. The US and EU do.
That is why Russia can act regionally but not systemically.
That is why Russia cannot impose structural adjustment on Africa or Latin America.
That is why Russia cannot sanction half the planet.
That is why Russia cannot print the world’s money.
Calling every state “equally imperialist” is not anti-imperialism. It is analytical laziness that flattens reality until power disappears.
You accuse me of “skipping” China and the USSR in Africa. Again, you do not understand exploitation. Building infrastructure, providing loans without regime change, and exchanging commodities is not the same as imperial extraction. Unequal exchange means extracting surplus value through pricing power and financial domination. China gains commodities. The West gains permanent dependency. These are not the same relationships.
You keep repeating that Eastern Europe is richer now. Yes. Because you became part of the imperial core’s labor chain. Cheap labor, subcontracting, offshoring, and EU capital inflows integrated Poland upward while Africa and Latin America were pushed further down. Someone always pays. Your growth did not come from “democracy.” It came from position in the global hierarchy.
That is exactly what you refuse to confront.
You talk endlessly about oligarchs but refuse to name the system that produces them. Oligarchy is not a personality defect. It is the inevitable outcome of capital accumulation. That is why oligarchs exist everywhere capitalism exists, including Norway, including Germany, including the US.
Calling China “state capitalism” while praising Nordic capitalism just reveals which ruling class you emotionally trust.
Your hatred of “authoritarianism” is not political. It is aesthetic. You dislike governments that look rough while tolerating governments that politely manage exploitation.
You claim social democracy is closer to socialism. This is historically false. Social democracy preserved capitalism by pacifying labor while imperial extraction funded concessions. When that extraction weakened, social democracy collapsed and immediately shifted right. That is not socialism in transition. That is capitalism in disguise.
This is why social democrats sided with fascists against communists in Germany. This is why they crushed revolutionary workers repeatedly. This is why they manage austerity today. Not accident. Function.
You keep shouting “strawman” because you cannot answer structure with intention. Materialism does not care what you personally support. It examines what systems do.
You are emotionally anti-imperialist but analytically liberal.
You oppose empire morally while repeating its framework intellectually.
You believe imperialism is bad but refuse to analyze who runs the world economy.
You want socialism but reject every historical attempt because it was “authoritarian,” while defending systems that kill millions quietly through debt, sanctions, poverty, and privatized healthcare.
That contradiction is not incidental. It is social-democratic ideology.
You are angry at capitalism’s outcomes while defending its global architecture.
Until you stop replacing class relations with morality and geopolitics with headlines, you will keep mistaking symptoms for causes.
That is why you think Russia explains fascism.
It does not.
Capitalism does.
You are a child who lacks any understanding of the world beyond vibes if you don't want to be called a liberal try moving beyond being one first before throwing a tantrum at it being pointed out.
I took some time to cool down despite your smug arrogance really pushing my buttons and realized something. We are approaching this from completely different frameworks. You are arguing from a liberal moral viewpoint that looks for bad actors, foreign interference, and individual state behavior. I am using a dialectical materialist analysis that looks at systems, class relations, and material causation. You focus on who funds what; I focus on why those movements gain mass support in the first place. You treat propaganda and foreign money as the source of fascism, while I see them as secondary factors that exploit conditions created by capitalist crisis. You define imperialism as any powerful country acting aggressively; I define it as a structured system of global capital domination based on finance control, unequal exchange, debt, and institutions. Because of this, you reduce politics to morality and geopolitics, while I analyze political economy and class power. Until that difference is acknowledged, we are not disagreeing on facts but talking past each other.
You do not actually understand imperialism, so every time the argument moves into political economy you retreat into vibes, NGO articles, and moral equivalence.
Ad personam, zero arguments.
You keep flooding links about Russia funding far-right groups as if anyone denied that.
And yet, you're trying to prove, that russian far right wing regime, and its imperialism it's not a supporter of far right in the west.
Funding does not create fascism.
So, funding very radical organizations does not creates them? Look what mostly west imperialism did in the middle east just by funding religious radicals. Funding far right organizations in the hard times, it's like adding fuel to the fire.
If Russian money alone created fascism,
This is the point that no one is stated. This is your straw man argument, that you're trying to push for a long time, and then answering "russia is not the responsible". Keep your straw man for yourself.
“Here are some links” is not analysis.
Giving your the links from so many sources, from Al Jazeera to The Guardian and so on. In some links there were official photos from official meeting of far right parties from europe, and everything was happening in russia for russian money and they were proud ot if. And yet for you its not analyze.
Imperialism is not “any country with power.”
No one is stating that. Stop with your lies. Russia is an imperialistic country, best example is attack on Ukraine, or whet they did in Georgia, and all the bad things that they are funding in europe, and so on and so on.
Ok, let's go back to school, you will learn something. What is imperialism:
imperialism, state policy, practice, or advocacy of extending power and dominion, especially by direct territorial acquisition or by gaining political and economic control of other areas. Because it always involves the use of power, whether military or economic or some subtler form, imperialism has often been considered morally reprehensible, and the term is frequently employed in international propaganda to denounce and discredit an opponent’s foreign policy.
Britanica.
And what are the key parts of imperialism: Economic control? Yes, russia wants it for example in Ukraine or Belarus. Militarism - of course. Territorial expansion - of course, like attack on Ukraine, Cultural Influence - yes, funding far right wing shit in europe, or push of russian language in Belarus. What have i missed?
Of course Russia is not only imperialistic country. USA is way richer country, so they can send more troops around the world.
You accuse me of “skipping” China and the USSR in Africa.
Pretending that China or Russia is not as exploitive as west in the Africa, is a big lie. Please, stop charitiwashing of east imperialism exploiting Africa. Please, stop it.
You keep repeating that Eastern Europe is richer now. Yes. Because you became part of the imperial core’s labor chain.
No, it's because in europe and west we're at least pretending to respect human rights, labor laws, and thanks to situation after the war, middle class was created in the west, thus there's still some money left in the middle class (but thanks to the neoliberalism, oligarch slowly sucking it from us). In the post soviet countries, after the collapse of the soviets, oligarchs was able to take almost everything to themself, so there's not a lot left, and there's no middle class, there's very little consumption, people are poor, non educated, therefore economy is not very efficient.
Poland is a part of richer part of the world, so it's quite obvious that we're going to be richer. And remember, that Russia sold way more stuff, and start doing it way earlier than Poland. And yet, in Russia all the money goes to oligarchs. So regular people was not benefiting from this.
And now look on the China, and compare it to russia. China was in a pretty bad situation 30 years ago. But they invest tons and tons of money in the knowledge building, in the science, heavy industry, and so on, and now they are one of the biggest economy in the world. And in the same time, russia that was pretty rich 30 years ago, once again is very poor and shitty thanks to the oligarchs. There are a lot of bad things that we can say about state capitalism that is in the China, but still they are able to use neoliberalism in the west, and suck a lot of money from west, and bring it to China. Neoliberalism is way worst than state capitalism.
Cheap labor, subcontracting, offshoring,
And China is doing way more of that, and it's getting richer way faster. Russia is also doing that, but thanks to oligarchs, they are failing.
EU capital inflows integrated Poland upward while Africa and Latin America were pushed further down.
And yet, Chins, is the capitol of manufacturing cheap stuff, and most of the minerals and materials are coming to china from Africa and Latin America. China is benefiting way more from Africa than EU. Why are you skipping China here?
Calling China “state capitalism” while praising Nordic capitalism just reveals which ruling class you emotionally trust.
Why are you lying? It's so tiring, when I'm trying to give you some answers, and then you're lying all the time, and i have to send answers to straw arguments.
China is a state capitalist country. That's fact. What this have to do with Norway capitalism? I don't know. Norway is a social democracy with mixed market economy. Quality of life, and labor laws are way better in Norway. Norway build it's economy power, thanks to natural resources.
our hatred of “authoritarianism” is not political. It is aesthetic. You dislike governments that look rough while tolerating governments that politely manage exploitation.
DUDE STOP LYING_ stop ad personam. This is really rude.
As i said, i hate authoritarian regimes, that's why I'm not a fan of any ruling class, no matter is it in Soviet Union, China, USA, or any other part of the world. And you're pretending that imperialism and exploitation is mostly western problem. Stop lying.
This is why social democrats sided
And why Soviet Unions sided with Nazis in 1939, and they worked with Nazis on attack on Poland in 1939? And what this have to do with todays world? I have no idea.
And why are you trying to picture me as a fan of social democracy? I have no idea.
So stop lying.
You keep shouting “strawman” because you cannot answer structure with intention.
Ad personam, you're also creating a lot of ad personam, insults. Like this one.
You are emotionally anti-imperialist but analytically liberal. You oppose empire morally while repeating its framework intellectually. You believe imperialism is bad but refuse to analyze who runs the world economy.
More lies and insults.
BTW. Oligarchs and few selected groups are ruling world economy. I listed them somewhere earlier. And countries that you're protecting, russia and china, are part of many of these groups. But what this have to do with anything, i have no idea.
You want socialism but reject every historical attempt because it was “authoritarian,”
One more lie. Just because soviet union failed because ruling class emerged after few decades, and then it has nothing to do with socialism, or because china is state capitalism, it doesn't mean that i'm rejecting any socialist movements.
And if you stop lying, i can give you example of socialist movement that actual worked, but it was then attacked by all the authoritarian regimes:
https://kolektiva.media/w/pKgGZtPdpr8MBeMxNTQjGJ?start=35m53s
I'm happy that once again i can teach you something :)
You are angry at capitalism’s outcomes while defending its global architecture.
More lies. Just because I'm against russian imperialism and china state capitalism, remember that I'm also USA imperialism and exploitation of African countries. But at least, I'm admitting that Africa is exploited by west and east imperialistic countries.
That is why you think Russia explains fascism.
Expands maybe? But i gave you a lot of proofs that russia is supporting facist movements around the world. So you skipped the facts and proofs, and now you're pretending that i never send it ? Dude XD
ou are a child who lacks any understanding of the world beyond vibes if you don’t want to be called a liberal try moving beyond being one first before throwing a tantrum at it being pointed out.
Stop licking east imperialistic boots, russia is clearly imperialistic country, it's a far right wing authoritarian regime, and you're licking their boots so hard. I don't understand, what someone who supports far right authoritarian regime, is doing on this board. Are you a troll or something?
You can lie and insult me as much as possible, but this does not make you right, or far right wing imperialistic authoritarian russian regime, a force of good.
Your response perfectly demonstrates why this conversation is going nowhere. You are arguing in bad faith, constantly negging, and acting like European chauvinist intellectual royalty while showing a complete lack of understanding of imperialism, class, or political economy. You misrepresent my arguments at every turn, expand the scope endlessly to avoid engaging the core issues, and reduce structural analysis to moral outrage and citations.
You insist that Russian funding of far-right groups “proves” something, but you cannot distinguish secondary influence from primary causation. Fascism did not emerge because Russia wrote checks; it emerges from capitalist crisis, austerity, precarity, and social-democratic betrayal. You treat explanation as denial and causation as endorsement, which is a methodological failure, not a factual dispute. Providing links and photos does not replace analysis. Your reliance on these citations shows you mistake evidence for explanation.
Your definition of imperialism is liberal and superficial. Quoting Britannica and reducing it to military aggression, territorial expansion, or cultural influence completely misses the Marxist point: imperialism is structural, rooted in finance, unequal exchange, debt, and institutional control. Russia may act regionally, but it does not control global finance, the reserve currency, or systemic mechanisms of exploitation. Flattening all actors into moral equivalence erases hierarchy and avoids engaging the real causes of global inequality.
You also misinterpret Eastern Europe’s relative growth as a result of democracy or labor law respect, ignoring the fact that integration into EU labor chains relies on exploitation elsewhere Africa, Latin America, and the periphery pay the cost. You conflate comparative development with justice or institutional success. Similarly, expanding the discussion to China, NATO, the USSR, or historical 1939 events is a constant red herring designed to distract from the structural argument about capitalism, class, and imperialism.
You personalize structural phenomena, calling out oligarchs and naming small groups while refusing to address the system that produces them. You repeatedly accuse me of lying, being ad personam, or defending Russia, which is projection. You are emotionally anti-imperialist but analytically liberal: you moralize actors and events while refusing to analyze class relations, capital accumulation, and systemic causation. That is why your arguments collapse into moral equivalence, citation lists, and endless historical trivia.
A third party reading this should understand the real divide here: I explain why crises, fascism, and reaction emerge from capitalism itself. You obsess over who is bad and who “funded” what, never grappling with the system that shapes outcomes. That is the fundamental difference between liberal moralism and dialectical materialism, and until that is acknowledged, no amount of links, indignation, or historical examples will get beyond talking past each other.
this conversation is going nowhere
Agree, since you're not responding to any argument, and you're only sending straw man arguments and and personam, it's hard.
You are arguing in bad faith, constantly negging
You're insulting me all the time, ignoring my arguments, evidences, logic, facts. Dude XD
acting like European chauvinist
Dude, this is too much. You're supporting racist and homophobic regimes, like the one in russia, this is the proof, that I'm not the one who is chauvinist. Like i wrote many times, I'm against imperialism, and exploitation of less fortunate countries. I explain to you how Poland was exploited by the soviets in the past, i explain to you how Africa is exploited by west and east, and why I'm against it. And you're supporting east imperialist just because you don't like west. We're not the same.
You misrepresent my arguments at every turn,
Wrong, you had no arguments. Only straw man arguments and ad personam.
You insist that Russian funding of far-right groups “proves” something,
I gave you the evidences, the facts. And my initial statement was that russia is one of the forces responsible for rise of far right shit in europe. And you're not trying to discuss this thesis, but trying to switch our discussion to why people are poor, and poor people are more probable to radicalize. You don't want to discuss the thesis, but want to switch to obvious thing. What would you do then, would you try to convince me, that russia is not the real imperialistic enemy of the world?
Fascism did not emerge
Oh, here we go XD I knew it, that you will push narrative, that we don't have to care about russia funding far right movements, it's fault of poor people XD
Providing links and photos does not replace analysis.
Yup, facts are not facts, we don't have to care. Comon need to lick putin's boots. Let's do it, russia is good, west is bad, what's wrong? XD
Stop lying dude/
Quoting Britannica
Yup, again, facts are not facts, and russian imperialism doesn't matter, because ad personam ad personam, insult, insult.
Russia may act regionally, but it does not control global finance,
Russia is a part of the same groups, that you mentioned before as a groups that are in the control. And russian oligarchs have influences all over the world.
Ok, we can go back to Africa, that is exploited by many countries, including ruSSia. Who is sending state funded paramilitary forces called Wagner Group?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wagner_Group_activities_in_Africa
Why they are killing and performing military shit there? We all knows. This is part of the militarism, that should not be there if your argument is right.
ignoring the fact that integration into EU labor chains relies on exploitation elsewhere Africa, Latin America, and the periphery pay the cost
So, you're talking about exploitation that China is a big part of the process, and russia is just too poor to be a part of, because for russian oligarchs exploitation of regular people is the most of what they know how to do. Remember, that huge part of russian economy is selling oil. Why regular people are not gaining nothing from the oil, and most of the money is going to private hands? Here's your exploitation and imperialism from ruSSia.
You personalize structural phenomena, calling out oligarchs and naming small groups while refusing to address the system that produces them.
More lies, keep lying, and creating straw man arguments.
And then go back to licking putin's boot.
You sound like a russian AI bot, sorry, i will not send you any answer.
I’m going to try to reset the tone and be clearer and without escalating this further.
I don’t support the Russian state, its oligarchs, or its internal politics. I’m Chinese, and my position is not based on liking or defending Russia. The issue is methodological. Disliking a government does not mean we can abandon serious analysis and replace it with moral labeling. Saying “this state is bad” is not the same thing as explaining how global power actually works.
I accept that I responded sharply at points. That said, the conversation deteriorated because any structural analysis I raised was immediately treated as propaganda or bootlicking. That reaction reflects a very common Western tendency to view people from the periphery as illegitimate speakers unless we repeat liberal conclusions. That dynamic matters, because it shuts down discussion before it even begins.
On China specifically: calling it “state capitalism” as a dismissal misunderstands Marxist theory. Lenin was explicit that state capitalism under proletarian political control is a necessary transitional stage in underdeveloped conditions. China has contradictions and real internal problems, but those are not the subject here. The discussion began with your claim that Russia is responsible for the rise of European fascism. Constantly shifting the debate to China avoids addressing that claim directly.
Imperialism is not defined simply by warfare, territorial disputes, or influence. It is a system of global capital accumulation based on monopoly finance, reserve currency power, control of trade routes, sanctions, debt regimes, and international institutions. The US, EU, NATO, and Five Eyes bloc dominate these structures. They can impose structural adjustment, control global payments, freeze assets worldwide, and extract surplus value permanently from the periphery. Russia and China cannot do this. They do not control the IMF, World Bank, SWIFT, global shipping insurance, or the world’s reserve currency. This is a structural distinction, not a moral defense of any state.
Yes, Russia operates regionally. Yes, it funds political actors abroad. That is not disputed. What is disputed is causality. Fascism does not originate from foreign funding. It arises from capitalist crisis. Austerity, privatization, labor precarity, housing collapse, and the betrayal of social democracy create the mass base for reaction. External funding can intensify these contradictions, but it cannot create them. Fuel is not the same thing as ignition.
If foreign money were the cause, Europe would not have produced fascist movements long before Putin, long before modern Russia, and long before 2014. European fascism is not imported. It is homegrown, rooted in European capitalism itself.
I will reiterate our disagreement is therefore not about whether Russia engages in harmful behavior which was never in question. It is about analytical framework. You approach politics through liberal moral reasoning focused on bad actors and state behavior. I approach it through dialectical materialism, focusing on systems, class relations, and global hierarchy.
That is the core issue.
