this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
375 points (99.7% liked)

politics

27131 readers
3071 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If’n we want to get fundamental , we know who shot who & still has 2 eyeballs. Just sayin’. If justice doesn’t serve us, perhaps the people shall determine the verdict for vermin passing as human. If we can doctor up a bill, float it through ice, pretend we gonna be head knockers, but b/c they didn’t really read fine print. Doozy of a munitions bill gets ice as it’s target. It can be done. But I’m leaning towards someone with more money & knowledge telling me it’s a great idea. Then that is the point where I say, great, you pay for it all. Then I end up floating somewhere in NJ. I live in the PNW. Any other ideas people?

[–] Poojabber@lemmy.world 3 points 48 minutes ago (1 children)

Maybe I just need some more coffee this morning, but right now, Im just wondering what this gibberish word salad is supposed to actually mean....

[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

I read an incredibly disturbing article about someone who was anti ice & ended up being offered a job. With ice. https://www.democracynow.org/2026/1/14/laura_jedeed_ice Holy Moly. Anyways. Yes. There is some gibberish mostly. Perhaps if we can read nuance and take that word salad, deconstruct. Then examine what we’re goin for. I’ll have another cup of java w/ya 😉

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

as bad as the blinding sounds, the shrapnel worries me more. i'm familiar with a kickass surgeon in phoenix who might be able to help, but i don't know how to contact the injured.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Thanks. My SIL had an awful carotid injury and the folk at ucsf did amazing things to save her life before a clinic in Phoenix did too. Dad had a great brain surgeon at ucsf too. They may be able to get some of that shrapnel out safely.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago

DEATH TO ICE

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 36 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 hours ago

Time to start firing back with some more lethal rounds

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 81 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

If this administration doesn't succeed in overthrowing democracy, and we ever get legitimate leaders again, I wonder if we could get some kind of official recognition or honor given to the people who have been wounded or killed while standing up for their rights and the rights of everyone in the U.S.?

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

If things go how they historically have in the US likely not

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 15 points 9 hours ago

My cynical take is in 20 years you'll have a day of remembrance and in 80 years your grandchildren will have official apologies, unless this current administration ends doesn't get thrown out within 5 years - then it will take even longer. My less cynical take is that these people aren't losing their lives or ability to see because they want official recognition or honour, they want freedom because that's the thing really matters. I do agree though, once the freedom (and rule of law) is back, these people definitely deserve some kind of official recognition or honour.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago

I hope so, and I hope these people and families get the reparations they deserve.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The reality is if you protest armed thugs, you really must wear PE. Protect your eyes, ears, elbows, knees. Ideally gas masks too.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago

Wear. Eye. Protection. Ballisitic goggles.

[–] Vupware@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 hours ago

This nation needs some R&R — Reparations and Repercussions.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Go to the local construction store and buy safety glasses.

[–] Saprophyte@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/ice-border-patrol-less-lethal-weapons-protesters/

The article was mistaken, they refer to it as non-lethal rounds. Even DHS itself refers to them as less lethal. There is a difference between less lethal and non-lethal.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

A point without distinction, mate. They fired a weapon at close range at that man. The state knows what potential these weapons have, which is why they use them.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

A point without distinction, mate.

I mean, that really depends on where you are, doesn't it? Some places make distinctions between non-lethal weapons and less-lethal weapons and some don't. Pretty much any weapon can kill if used on someone's head or other vital areas. Projectiles tend to fly faster the closer they are to what shot them.

I see the issue as either one of poor training (not trained to use the weapon) or poor training (trained to use the less-lethal weapon in a lethal manner) and I'm not sure which frightens me more right now. Probably the latter.