I thought they were based on gorgons, specifically gorgoneion which is the image of just the head of a gorgon.
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)
No Stupid Questions
45526 readers
722 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah it's pretty clearly Medusa/Gorgon-inspired. Obviously, it has its own unique twist, as it should, and probably includes aspects from some other references as well (Scylla, Cyclops, and the Hydra from classical mythology, and various Lovecraftian and Science-fiction tentacle/blob monsters that were common throughout the 60s and 70s) but the basic imagery and functionality is too similar to a gorgon to ignore that there's likely some connection, whether conscious and intentional or not.
Nice connection there
The beholder (eye tyrant, sphere of many eyes) is most frequently found underground, although it infrequently will lair in desolate wildernesses. The globular body of this monster is supported by levitation, and it floats slowly about as it wills. Atop the sphere are 10 eyestalks, while in its central area are a great eleventh eye and a large mouth filled with pointed teeth. The body is protected by a hard chitinous covering. The creature's eyestalks and eyes are also protected, although less well. [...] Because of its particular nature the beholder is able to withstand the loss of its eyestalks, these members are not computed as part of its hit point damage potential, and lost eyestalkswill eventually grow back (1 week per lost member). The body of the monster can withstand two-thirds of its total damage potential, while the great central eye can withstand one-third this total ...
Advanced D&D Monster Manual 1977
added for context not to be argumentative ... it came out in '75 ... my copy of the MM is from 1977
not to be argumentative
Genuinely makes me happy to see friendly touches like this.
Advanced D&D Monster Manual 1977
added for context not to be argumentative ... it came out in '75 ... my copy of the MM is from 1977>
Yes, I think I mentioned it came out in the '75? According to Wikipedia at least, although it is unclear whether it was publicly released that year. The material there cited is also from the '77.
I wonder if they could have been inspired by the writings (and some illustrations) of HP Lovecraft? I'm no lore expert there, but a Beholder wouldn't be out of place by the side of some of the others.
Yeah. Lovecraft was one of the popular authors the creators of D&D had read. Sci-fi, fantasy, horror etc genres did not have tons of superstars in the 70s, so a lot of people were reading the same books/authors. It's similar to how everyone had seen movies like Jason and the Argonauts.
Lovecraft was writing back in the 30's, the same era of early Conan etc, but had become much more popular by the 70s.
I wonder if they had to pay to use something similar in Big Trouble in Little China.
iirc Wikipedia doesn't mention Big Trouble in Little China as copyright infringement, but it mentions that example as something similar, whereas other media does get mentioned as infringing copyright.
Apparently the only one who got to use a beholder as such and not get a lawsuit was Pixar, who managed to get permission from WotC. I guess this means both have similarly strong lawyers
Did Wikipedia mention that what it sees, Lo Pan knows?
'Garth Marenghi's Darkplace' (TV, 2000s) also had something similar in the "skipper the eyechild" episode. Nsfw if anyone searches it. I'd be quite surprised if they paid royalties for that.
There is plenty of similar, I also recall a Powerpuff girls episode with something like a beholder, also in the 90s I think. No infringement either, because it wasn't exactly a beholder nor it was called a beholder.
That Pixar movie did use a proper beholder though.
Anyway.... They're all after 1975 so...
Yeah I'm surprised no one has dug up any obscure faerie or troll creature. So it does seem to be fairly original thing with maybe some medusa inspiration.
In the real world some of the drawings of beholders with toothy mouths make me think of angler fish.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_one-eyed_creatures_in_mythology_and_fiction
There's some cool things in this list, but i don't see anything like it really similar enough.
Closest in appearance might be this listed as a 1973 comic, so close in time, but maybe too tentacleish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuma-Gorath
I can't get past this one though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kasa-obake
They are generally umbrellas with one eye and jump around with one leg . . .
That should have been in D&D
I think that's it, you've found it, it's Shuma-Gorath. It's really close chronologically, it's in a very popular publication, and also in the oldest depictions I could find it also sports something like the "chitinous plates" the beholder description has. According to Wikipedia too, Shuma was/is one of the most popular kaiju-type villains in Marvel. It also says Shuma can levitate and shoot rays off his eye and tentacles.
Eyeballs on tentacles/eyestalks were much more popular back in the day than now, especially for alien or extraterrestrial designs. So there isn't a huge leap from Shuma gorath to Beholder.
I was hoping for more sci fi or fantasy fans to crop up and point at other characters from 60's or earlier novels, however, no luck so far. Someone pointed a beholder wouldn't look out of place in a Lovecraft story and I agree but yours was the only concrete example so, congrats, enjoy your trophy!
Copyright only protects a specific artistic expression, not a concept.
So you can use the concept of a giant floating eye with ten eye tentacles that shoot lasers. Full stop.
But you can't call it a beholder (due to trademark, not copyright), and you can't use their artwork of the concept.
My question was "where were the beholder -like creatures in the media before 1975?" Specifically looking for examples of similar things that were already in circulation before.