this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
458 points (98.3% liked)

Comic Strips

21150 readers
2389 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 66 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm sure I could learn to read this as quickly as any other clock, given practice. I saw one 45 years ago on the mantel in someone's house. My nerdy teenage friend had learned how to read it and taught me. I didn't have one to practice with, and quickly forgot. Forty-five years later, and I've never seen another one.

This display, as a clock interface for humans, makes no sense in the real world. Outside of showing it to people as a novelty.

If you want a cool clock that anyone can read, get a nixie tube clock.

[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

I fucking love my nixie clock.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)
[–] Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

Considering current events; way out there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 48 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I had a binary watch in highschool. They're really not that hard to read once you know how. Practical? No. But they're great for showing everyone you're the biggest dork in the class.

[–] salacious_coaster@feddit.online 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I had the ThinkGeek circuit board binary watch like 20 years ago. Honestly, I only stopped wearing it because you had to push a button to light up the LEDs.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago

Mine might've been from ThinkGeek as well. I always loved visiting their website, before they became yet another pop culture store and got bought up by GameStop anyway.

[–] ttyybb@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

In that case I might need one...

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For those who aren't familiar, this is how you read this. Just add up the columns where there are lights.

* 8 * 8 * 8
* 4 4 4 4 4
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1 1 1

So the last panel doesn't have any 8s and is read like this. You add the columns.

- 4 4 - - 4
- - - 2 2 -
1 1 - 1 - 1

And adding those columns gives you:

1 5 4 3 2 5

15:43:25

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Fuck this, too much brain power needed to simply tell the time. I'll stick with my smartwatch (FWIW I at least use an analog watch face 'cause although I'm dumb, I'm not that dumb).

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Pebble

This is the level of watchface I need to tell the time quickly

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Damn, even in my native language that would be way harder for me than just numbers. The easiest is the traditional watch face lmao, I even process numbers to it to actually understand the time. Sure I can read that text fast, but processing the words into numbers and then into actual time takes like five times longer than just numbers to time...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I really don't like these. It's binary for each digit, so it's really just a bad proxy for decimal numbers rather than being clean binary numbers. If it were roman numerals, I feel like it would be equally silly to separate the numbers this way: 15:39 -> I, V : III, IX.

I understand that it makes it hard to read if the binary numbers go high, but that's why we don't use them like this.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They should make one that shows the unix timestamp with the full 32 bits lmao

[–] noerdman@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago

64 bits please. We don't want a year 2038 problem.

[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

BCD is something that's supported directly by some processor instruction sets.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

My math teacher in high school had one of these, though he never mentioned what it was to us. I used to stare at it off and on during class, and eventually it clicked “Oh, it’s a clock!” After that, with some intense staring, I figured out the pattern and was satisfied. Asked the teacher about it later, and apparently I had taught myself binary.

That knowledge displaced whatever he was talking about that day. Hopefully it wasn’t too important.

[–] TisI@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

And kids, that's the story of how I became binary.

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

15:39? Then takes him 3 minutes

[–] Tja@programming.dev 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

15:39:02 until 15:43:25, so more than 4 minutes.

It is afternoon, tho.

[–] bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

"If the first column has lights, it's more than likely afternoon" lol

[–] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The true binary clock: afternoon or not-afternoon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 5 points 5 days ago

I mean, if you don't need to know the precise time it''s indeed useful and cool...but there are better ways to do it

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Six columns of binary numbers each representing a base 10 digit to display three base 10 numbers is kinda stupid, but it is easier to read than just having three binary numbers I guess.

[–] four@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wdym three binary numbers? Just one is enough. Make it a Unix timestamp so you can have a calendar built in!

[–] noerdman@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 5 days ago

Yeah, what kind of idiot needs repeating patterns in the time format for repeating times during a day? Just display the unix timestamp on the clock tower and be done with it.

Actually, having 64 bits arranged vertically on a tower seems neat.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

When it's a 24 h display like in the cartoon the digits must have more lights to represent numbers higher than 15. The clock in the cartoon only has four lights per column.

I'd prefer your version of this clock.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Seems to be, although that's a very loose interpretation of what a "binary clock" means. Splitting the tens columns into a new digit is mathematically gibberish.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't.

[–] noerdman@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

... and those who know at base n, "10" can represent literally any number.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

That's why you always specify the base

10~10~

"10" can represent literally any number.

That sounds eminently practical. There's NO way that would ever lead to any excess ambiguity! 😄

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nroth@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wouldn't it make more sense for the clock to have just 3 rows or columns? Hour/minute/second.

[–] Rednax@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Yeah, this one is just messed up. They use binary to display the individual characters of a decimal number. This makes it wayyy harder to read than a proper binary clock.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I don't know why he has such trouble. You really should only need 1 bit to determine whether or not it's afternoon. Just look at the "afternoon" bit light. 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean, they obfuscated it by adding seconds. It's really not that hard. Just takes a few seconds instead of a glance.

[–] noerdman@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If that obfuscated something, it wasn't on purpose... it's just literally the clock in my dad's kitchen.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's to make a nerdy thing more nerdy. But they really shouldn't have added seconds to a thing that takes more than a second to read.

[–] noerdman@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

imho, the "seconds" bits are neat because you can see things change... Like, you see that it does stuff. Like the "seconds" hand on an analogue clock, it's mostly practical to see that it's working as expected.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

In college, I had a binary clock and a binary watch. They were great! I could read them just fine; everyone else couldn't. Stopped using them because they were bright as hell! The watch doubled as a flashlight at times (depending what time it was). Eventually, the battery in the watch died. I think both were gotten from thinkgeek (back when it was good).

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yet they are abundant, esp. with Linux GUIs. Every clock applet has a binary option: digital, analog, binary. And fuzzy, which is what the yellow-haired guy is doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I have a watch that shows binary time. Two rows, I think 12 hour cycle, no seconds. Pretty easy to read, honestly. Also an absolute nerd gadget and I loved it.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

6 bit, 6 bit, 7 bit? Huh. Only 5, 6, and 6, is needed for 24-hr binary-coded-sexagesimal... ohh. It's binary-coded-decimal-coded-sexagesimal.

15:43:25 in the last panel. Or about a quarter to four in the afternoon.

I suppose the 5,6,6 BCS option would need a lot more mental effort.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›