this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
92 points (98.9% liked)

Europe

8419 readers
1250 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Italy fined Cloudflare 14.2 million euros for refusing to block access to pirate sites on its 1.1.1.1 DNS service, the country’s communications regulatory agency, AGCOM, announced yesterday. Cloudflare said it will fight the penalty and threatened to remove all of its servers from Italian cities.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Fuck off Italy with your shitty piracy shield

[–] randomname@scribe.disroot.org 21 points 22 hours ago

No matter what your opinion is on that matter, Cloudflare is a curse rather than a merit imo.

As we know, Cloudflare's roots go back to 2004 when Matthew Prince and Cloudflare co-founder Lee Holloway were working on a computer industry project they called Honey Pot. They wanted to close-down the project already, but then, as the BBC reported in 2016,

[Mr. Prince] got an unexpected phone call from the US Department of Homeland Security asking him about the information he had gathered on attacks.

Mr Prince recalls: "They said 'do you have any idea how valuable the data you have is? Is there any way you would sell us that data?'.

"I added up the cost of running it, multiplied it by ten, and said 'how about $20,000 (£15,000)?'.

"It felt like a lot of money. That cheque showed up so fast."

Mr Prince, who has a degree in computer science, adds: "I was telling the story to Michelle Zatlyn, one of my classmates, and she said, 'if they'll pay for it, other people will pay for it'." ...

In 2017, Cloudflare also provided services to neo-Nazi sites like The Daily Stormer, including giving them personal information on people who complain about their content.

There are more similar stories about this company than these.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

How are we in @europe@feddit.org and people don't know about https://dns.sb/ ?

[–] Defectus@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

First time I heard about it. Intrigued.

[–] xvertigox@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

The Cloudflare CEO also just paid tribute to JD Vance and Musk.

Yesterday a quasi-judicial body in Italy fined @Cloudflare $17 million for failing to go along with their scheme to censor the Internet. The scheme, which even the EU has called concerning, required us within a mere 30 minutes of notification to fully censor from the Internet any sites a shadowy cabal of European media elites deemed against their interests. No judicial oversight. No due process. No appeal. No transparency. It required us to not just remove customers, but also censor our 1.1.1.1 DNS resolver meaning it risked blacking out any site on the Internet. And it required us not just to censor the content in Italy but globally. In other words, Italy insists a shadowy, European media cabal should be able to dictate what is and is not allowed online.

That, of course, is DISGUSTING and even before yesterday’s fine we had multiple legal challenges pending against the underlying scheme. We, of course, will now fight the unjust fine. Not just because it’s wrong for us but because it is wrong for democratic values.

In addition, we are considering the following actions: 1) discontinuing the millions of dollars in pro bono cyber security services we are providing the upcoming Milano-Cortina Olympics; 2) discontinuing Cloudflare’s Free cyber security services for any Italy-based users; 3) removing all servers from Italian cities; and 4) terminating all plans to build an Italian Cloudflare office or make any investments in the country.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. While there are things I would handle differently than the current U.S. administration, I appreciate @JDVance taking a leadership role in recognizing this type of regulation is a fundamental unfair trade issue that also threatens democratic values. And in this case @ElonMusk is right: #FreeSpeech is critical and under attack from an out-of-touch cabal of very disturbed European policy makers.

I will be in DC first thing next week to discuss this with U.S. administration officials and I’ll be meeting with the IOC in Lausanne shortly after to outline the risk to the Olympic Games if @Cloudflare withdraws our cyber security protection.

In the meantime, we remain happy to discuss this with Italian government officials who, so far, have been unwilling to engage beyond issuing fines. We believe Italy, like all countries, has a right to regulate the content on networks inside its borders. But they must do so following the Rule of Law and principles of Due Process. And Italy certainly has no right to regulate what is and is not allowed on the Internet in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, China, Brazil, India or anywhere outside its borders.

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT FIGHT AND WE WILL WIN!!!

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 12 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you cloudflare, i don't use their DNS but it's a good thing they don't respect piracy """shield"""

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

For me they're the default, if nothing extra is needed. Just once I experienced a weird network that only allowed Google DNS (8.8.8.8) for god knows what reason.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Try 9.9.9.9 instead. (Quad9)

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 20 hours ago

I did, didn't work either.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I use NextDNS, it's very customizable, allowing blocklists too

[–] warm@kbin.earth 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Piracy... let the courts deal with it. It's no business of a government.

If companies want less piracy, they can choose to provide a better and more affordable product.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 19 hours ago

If we only had a period or a branch when/where piracy was/is comparatively low so we could see what was done then to learn what compells people to pirate...

Na, kidding, better fracture the market to drain consumers for as much money as possible and lobby lawmakers to make laws in favor of huge corporate license hoarders.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Honestly, I'd just spit off their 1.1.1.1 service into some sort of separate company so that Italy doesn't have jurisdiction and leave their servers where they are so that the CDN stuff keeps working, unless they think that Italy is gonna pass some kind of legislation that goes after the CDN stuff.

I don't know if 1.1.1.1 is all over. If it is, I imagine that it'd need some kind of BGP black magic to make a single IP address exist at many places on the Internet. If so, and if they have a 1.1.1.1 server in Italy, have to pull that out of Italy.

investigates

Yeah, looks like it's all over.

For me, the next-to-last-hop is 172.68.188.80:

$ mtr -r 1.1.1.1|tail -n2
 12.|-- 172.68.188.80              0.0%    10   17.8  26.3  17.8  33.6   4.5
 13.|-- one.one.one.one            0.0%    10   21.7  23.2  17.5  28.7   4.0

That's a North American address, something managed by ARIN, NET-172-64-0-0-1.

This does traceroutes from around Europe:

https://perfops.net/traceroute-from-europe

From Manchester, it's 141.101.71.91, somewhere in Europe. From Amsterdam, 141.101.65.161. From London, 141.101.71.63 or 141.101.71.47. From Reykjavik, 37.235.49.2. All in Europe, netblocks managed by RIPE and mostly owned by CloudFlare.

Interesting. I don't think I've ever seen that before, but I suppose that handing back different content keyed off the person requesting it is kinda CloudFlare's forte, albeit normally done via DNS responses dependent upon the IP address doing the querying, rather than routing rules depending on it.

EDIT: I think that a bigger problem for Italy is that it's really easy for someone else to just set up a public DNS server that isn't in Italy and have it forward queries to 1.1.1.1, and the vast majority of public DNS servers aren't in Italy and aren't going to care about Italian law, so Italy would be looking at blocking DNS queries out of Italy, which might be doable, if a stupendous pain in the ass for network admins, as well as blocking DNS-over-HTTP out of Italy, which I suspect is going to be a lot more difficult.

https://globalping.io/network-tools/dns-from-italy

It also looks like all three of the Italian DNS servers this website queries can resolve thepiratebay.org, which I'd think that Italy would have blocked if they block anything on piracy grounds, so I dunno how much compliance there is even from Italian operators of DNS servers.

EDIT2: Apparently some Italian website will let you check if a domain name is blocked by Italy's PiracyShield:

https://piracyshield.iperv.it/

It looks like they don't block thepiratebay.org, oddly-enough.

https://piracyshield.iperv.it/ticket_items/4911

That has a partial list of what appears to be blocked FQDNs, but they're partially-censored, so maybe Italy doesn't permit people to actually release a list of what they're blocking (which...I guess would make sense, since it'd basically be a list of places to get pirated content).

EDIT3: And they do apparently disallow release, but I bet that someone would leak it, and sure enough:

https://walledculture.org/academic-research-finds-economic-technical-and-operational-harms-from-italys-piracy-shield/

As the paper notes, one of the major concerns about the system is the lack of transparency: AGCOM does not publish a list of IP addresses or domain names that are subject to its blocking. That not only makes it extremely difficult to correct mistakes, it also – conveniently – hides those mistakes, as well as the scope and impact of Piracy Shield. To get around this lack of transparency, the researchers had to resort to a dataset leaked on GitHub, which contained 10,918 IPv4 addresses and 42,664 domain names (more precisely, the latter were “fully qualified domain names” – FQDN) that had been blocked.

They don't link to it, but a search later, I think that this might be it:

https://github.com/PiracyShield/RoutingTable

For domains:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PiracyShield/RoutingTable/refs/heads/main/fqdns.txt

And sure enough, thepiratebay.org isn't in there.