this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
181 points (99.5% liked)

News

34089 readers
1784 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas officials have turned over the state’s voter roll to the U.S. Justice Department, according to a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, complying with the Trump administration’s demands for access to data on millions of voters across the country.

The Justice Department last fall began asking all 50 states for their voter rolls — massive lists containing significant identifying information on every registered voter in each state — and other election-related data. The Justice Department has said the effort is central to its mission of enforcing election law requiring states to regularly maintain voter lists by searching for and removing ineligible voters.

Alicia Pierce, a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, told Votebeat and The Texas Tribune that the state had sent its voter roll, which includes information on the approximately 18.4 million voters registered in Texas, to the Justice Department on Dec. 23.

The state included identifiable information about voters, including dates of birth, driver’s license numbers and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers, Pierce said.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago (3 children)

......and this surely had nothing to do with the announcement of door-to-door ICE operations. In Texas. A state that has a 40% Hispanic population.

40% Hispanic population... for now.

Some of those Hispanics trace back before Texas existed, for extra irony. White people came over to steal land and run slave trades and got mad when the natives decided to stop that shit, so Texas became a thing. Then they hitched their horses to the confederacy and never looked back.

[–] Failship@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 3 days ago

Wildly enough, a decent amount of those Hispanic voters voted for trump.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago

Now the federal government has a list of everyone who votes. And people still think the elections are going to be fair? With that information they can manufacture any votes they want.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Does it include who someone voted for.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It shouldn't.

The only thing that will be there is what party one is affiliated with.

Who you actually vote for?

That is stil secret, though I'm not in Texas (thank God..) but I make it VERY plain that I vote almost exclusively against the party I am registered with.

I am registered as a Republican. It's a fantastic way to get their party propaganda and the inside info on their candidates at the state level.. who actually offer ZERO to the public.

I've been voting straight Democratic ticket for years.

I imagine that the leverage point will be to try and invalidate voters such as myself, who do NOT pose a target as determined by party affiliation, but will skew the votes away from the expected tally, thus allowing the GOP to cry that there is voter fraud.

(Yo, morons... there's no fraud. Your candidates just suck so much I choose the opposition instead..)

The MAGA wonks expect everyone that calls themself a Republican is intersted in sucking Trump's cock, because they all do.

It's disgusting how well they seem to like the taste of a kiddy-fucker's dick.

Lest we forget, there's the Epstein files to consider.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Doesn't matter, scotus already said they can fuck with whoever they want based on racial profiling, so, I bet they're gonna harass anyone they feel like from the list with a Hispanic sounding name.

No, but the addresses are there. They can just exise the blue districts if they want. State is already threatening to take over Harris county elections for just this reason.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

WA just publishes that for everyone to see. It's wild that they do that.

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

They don't publish your DOB, birthdate, or DL/SSN though, and WA doesn't keep a party affiliation as part of the voter registration.

With what Texas just shared though, anyone with that database could call and impersonate any voter and change or cancel their registration.

[–] jonathan7luke@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

So does Texas actually. But the part that I finally found in this article which is noteworthy is this:

The state included identifiable information about voters, including dates of birth, driver’s license numbers and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers, Pierce said.

So what got sent to the federal government included additional PII not present in the public dataset.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I can excuse murder and pedophilia, but I draw the line at flagrant FEC violations.