this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
7 points (88.9% liked)

Thoughtful Discussion

374 readers
4 users here now

Welcome

Open discussions and thoughts. Make anything into a discussion!

Leaving a comment explaining why you found a link interesting is optional, but encouraged!

Rules

  1. Follow the rules of discuss.online
  2. No porn
  3. No self-promotion
  4. Don't downvote simply because you disagree or as a reaction to a title. Doing so may result in a temp community ban.

More posting guidelines can be found here:

https://discuss.online/post/33592245

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

About

Welcome to !discuss@discuss.online! This community is intended as a place for thoughtful discussion to happen, and this post will attempt to explain the goals of the community and how it's intended to work.

This is community is intended to be a place to slow down and think a bit before responding. If you see something interesting, talk about it! Substantive doesn't have to mean "deeply researched and cited" (though that's always appreciated, of course), but please avoid low-effort and joke responses. Ideally, you'll come away from here better for the time spent. The general discuss.online posting guidelines have some more guidance as well. Here's a slightly adapted version as well, for convenience:

Try to create interesting discussion. The best conversation brings a fresh perspective. Substantive comments are expected particularly for contentious topics.

Practice the Principle of Charity. Seek out common ground, and assume the best of others. Inquire, don't attack.

Humor is fine, but avoid low-effort common joke responses.

Don't test boundaries, that's not what the community is for. Consider yourself an honored guest, and respect the mods as people with lives.

Much of the Hacker News Guidelines are relevant as well, if you'd like additional guidelines.

What to Post

Post anything you find interesting! This community is intended to have a very wide focus, so anything from a cool new physics discovery to a deep dive into the hardware for an obsolete gaming console. The only real offtopic items would be political news. This isn't a community for "Politician does Bad Thing!", but "Here's a history of Bad Thing and how Politician works into it" might be appropriate

Moderation

Please downvote posts that won't do a good job of promoting interesting discussion. Please do not downvote posts just as a reaction to the title. If you repeatedly downvote without commenting, or participate (even once) in downvote brigading, you may be given a temp ban from the community, but:

Don't take it personally

Lemmy's moderation tools are lacking in this regard, so consider a temp ban a friendly "Please slow your roll". If you feel that you were wrongly banned or have any other questions, please join us at #online.discuss:discuss.online, we're a friendly bunch! Please do not DM anybody in response as that can easily come across as harassment, even if not intended that way.

This is a tiny community and not one oriented towards growth. If it ever grows big enough that the above moderation policies cause issues in the wider Fediverse, it will be revisited.

And finally, link to post image on Wikimedia commons:

Woman with wax tablets and stylus (so-called "Sappho")

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The latter two paragraphs, beginning respectively with "Note that we don’t disable downvoting for the entire instance" and "Note also that any mods that are also admins" are conflating multiple issues, and I think you should remove them from here.

Specifically, you need a post that will LONG outlast any temporary criticism made by thin-skinned people who didn't bother to read the community rules, then upon being censured turn around and call for defederation of the entire instance that this tiny specialized community is located on. If you want to respond to those allegations, do so in those other Lemmy support or YPTB posts (where the response will be seen by those most interested in those respective topics), but keep this pinned post sharply focused on its own goal of explaining the rules of this particular community, not e.g. why Discuss.Online chooses to enable downvoting or not.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good call. Those belong in something more like an FAQ section, but there's not really enough to justify having that sort of section in the first place.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Some of those questions were not legitimate and not worth responding to - like why not disable votes on the entire instance, duh that's a choice made by the entire instance, not a single community on it. Such a "hey, I'm just asking questions here" sea-lion approach usually does not lead to very interesting, thoughtful or fruitful discussion after starting from such false premises.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Great primer. You might consider having a thoughtful moderation bot/account when enforcing moderation decisions for the community that don't reflect admin decisions for instance rules as a whole.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 3 points 2 days ago

That's a great idea, thanks!