536
submitted 7 months ago by TangledHyphae@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 99 points 7 months ago

So at this rate, we'll get them on this most recent price fixing in 15 years

[-] jjagaimo@lemmy.ca 38 points 7 months ago

If you account for inflation, it'll actually be 30 years

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 65 points 7 months ago

If executives don't go to jail for stealing from consumers, they will continue to steal from you and everyone else.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

If the fines were 10 times the illegal gains, and came from executive salaries first, that would also be a strong deterrent.

[-] Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Brb imma go steal some eggs

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago
[-] scipm@lemmy.world 47 points 7 months ago

Hope I didn't need to save my receipts to be part of the class action $1 payout

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
  1. Company steals a thousand dollars each from their customers.

  2. Customers file class action lawsuit.

  3. Judge rules the company has to pay a million dollars even though they stole a total of ten million.

  4. Lawyers take half, the customers each get two nickles and a pop-up middle finger novelty toy.

  5. GOTO 1

Class action lawsuits are utterly broken which is why companies fuck over customers with zero hesitation.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 10 points 7 months ago

Don't you know you're supposed to number your lines in BASIC by tens, in case you need to insert something in the middle? You're going to end up having to renumber all your lines!

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

Oh boy, wait til they hear what they did two years ago.

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

remindme! 17 years

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 37 points 7 months ago

good thing the people responsible for these decisions will have long-since moved on and thus be impervious to any rulings that might come from this discovery

[-] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago
[-] throwmeinthekbin@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago

Those responsible for sacking the people who have been sacked have also been sacked.

[-] Deiv@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

The chickens? Also sacked.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 34 points 7 months ago

This isn't about consumers, at all. this is corpos including Kellogg etc suing their egg supplier for price fixing.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

Every company has conspired to raise every price over the last few years. Nice to know some scapegoat might potentially see consequences in 2050 or so.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

It's time... to get hit by a tiny fine that makes it just the cost of doing business, with no other repercussions so that they can do it again. Yay for our judicial system.

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 9 points 7 months ago

Slap them with a huge fine and use it to fund more antitrust investigation and prosecution.

[-] Froyn@kbin.social 4 points 7 months ago
[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Hardly. But wishful thinking, and it's the most reasonable way to self fund this kind of consumer protection because it's much harder to defund.

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Back yard chickens have been a fing blessing

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Or you can be insane like me, and don't eat eggs at all. Mostly because prostate cancer runs in my family and eggs drastically increase risk of lethal prostate cancer. It's the lethal aspect of egg cancer that bothers me after my grandfather died from it.

[-] OrganicLife@reddthat.com 10 points 7 months ago

Just looked it up and ,holy shit, there is a link between eggs and prostate cancer. And full fat dairy apparently. https://www.pcf.org/c/prostate-cancer-and-eggs-dairy-supplements-your-questions-answered-part-1/

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

The sad part is that it's mostly in the yolks, which is my main reason for eating them. Research suggests 2 a week or less, so I try to stick to that guideline to stay on the safe side. If it hadn't impacted my grandfather I probably would have never known about the link.

[-] OrganicLife@reddthat.com 0 points 7 months ago

The yolks are the best part! I was gonna make some deviled eggs but now I can't. Gonna maybe stick with 1 or 2 a week

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

You probably can. If I were to do it, I'd probably gorge one day on 12 deviled eggs and call it good for a couple weeks, probably minimizes total damage (instead of a continuous exposure every day, similar to how professional eaters work.)

[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

That's actually pretty interesting. I had no idea that there was a link between eggs and prostate cancer. I don't think anyone in my family has had it but this definitely gives me some motivation to look further into studies on it.

Much appreciated

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Speedy justice!

[-] nwilz@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Eggs were cheap then, I worked at a grocery store and they were regularly $1 for a dozen

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
536 points (99.4% liked)

News

21718 readers
3566 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS