this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
608 points (99.2% liked)

News

36912 readers
2609 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Moments after an ICE agent fatally shot a woman in Minneapolis, a man who identified himself as a doctor was barred by officers from checking on the victim.

Video taken by a witness in the aftermath of the shooting on Wednesday, Jan. 7 was obtained by the Huffington Post.

The video picks up after the woman's SUV crashed into a parked car after she was shot by the ICE agent.

"Can I go check a pulse?," a man asks.

An agent tells the man, "No," and to back up.

"I'm a physician," the man replied.

"I don't care," one agent is heard saying, while another says that EMS is on the way and that they had their own medics on scene.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 156 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Renee Good was without medical care for at least 10 minutes, and eyewitness reports state that ICE vehicles blocked EMS and responders were forced to approach the scene on foot.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like accessory to murder.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Sounds like felony murder.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like ICE officers should get the same treatment as the Norwegian traitors got during and after WWII: Taken into the cold Norwegian forest, only to be filled with lead.

We could skip the "Norwegian forest" part.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I feel like a better option would be to show them what is felt by the people they do this to.

Have them set free in the Norwegian forest with some form of tracking, and then have them hunted for sport. I want them to feel the fear that every single minority feels when they simply walk up to their car.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Felony Murder” is a specific kind of legal jargon that refers to being involved in a crime where someone died, right? IIRC?

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Yep, and spreads culpability to everyone involved in the underlying crime, even if they didn’t pull the trigger.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago

Works for me

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

they wanted her die, because if she did survive, thier would be more media attention on this, plus lawsuits, and charges being filed too. and it also gives the right wing MSM some soundbites, that its her fault, if they can obfuscate the investigation, which they did since the FBI is already covering it up.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

One of the things they teach cops (and some CCW holders): if you're going to shoot someone, kill them. It's easier to put words in a corpse's mouth.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago

and eyewitness reports state that ICE vehicles blocked EMS and responders were forced to approach the scene on foot

There is a video of that. I don't have the link anymore sadly but I have seen it

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 88 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's an interesting thing because when you deny a doctor access to save someone's life, I think that opens you up to murder charges. I would love to see every officer on scene be charged with murder for those horrible acts that they all did together.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I was about to say this. Surely denying medical attention is illegal?

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They shot her in the head four times. There wasnt any amount of attention that would have made her survive. Her brain was splattered on the dash like come on what are yall even talking about

[–] Helluh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

They are likely no trained to declare deceased status, so even though it may appear obvious, they are supposed to treat her as though alive. Thus declining medical attention could be legal grounds for murder.

I know most police organizations cannot declare it, nor can prison guards. So it would follow that legally ICE probably can't.

[–] silvadinlabop@lemmy.cafe 67 points 2 months ago
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

She was shot multiple times point blank in the head.

Those gravy seals knew they killed her and didn't want anyone to bother verifying it.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 21 points 2 months ago

They didn't want any witnesses to describe what they had seen.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf 35 points 2 months ago

“In my work with the defendants (at the Nuremberg Trials 1945-1949) I was searching for the nature of evil and I now think I have come close to defining it. A lack of empathy. It’s the one characteristic that connects all the defendants, a genuine incapacity to feel with their fellow men. Evil, I think, is the absence of empathy.”

  • Captain G. M. Gilbert, the Army psychologist assigned to watching the defendants at the Nuremberg trials

“I don’t care,” one agent is heard saying.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I’m thinking if they were the ones shot in the face, they would prefer the human beings surrounding them to allow any sort of available aid to be administered. Guess we will never know.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Sound like the time for the Scientific Method. We have a hypothesis:

if they were the ones shot in the face, they would prefer the human beings surrounding them to allow any sort of available aid to be administered

Now we have to design the experiment. I'm thinking that step one would be to shoot one of them in the face, and ask if they want help for that.

Ah, who am I kidding? These Dumb Apes don't know what the Scientific Method is.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago

One means nothing. You need a much bigger sample size to reach any significant conclusions.

Also, actually providing any aid would interfere with the experiment, so don't.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

We can't let the public's education level become an obstacle to our experimentations; we should press on with testing regardless.

[–] aeshna_cyanea@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

never say never

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You also need the control of aid not being promptly allowed to verify the results are repeatable.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

We know you don't care, and that's why I don't care about you. You are an evil bastard.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago

The objective is to instill fear in the population. Apparently all those militia types that have previously been so visible toting their guns around while dressed in tactical gear are too scared now so it is working.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

There are people who go to sleep knowing who these ICE agents are. They aren't fully anonymous.

Trumpism/Trump cultists have no humanity in them. They are power hungry ghouls trying to do anything for power and wealth.