this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
47 points (79.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

39123 readers
1717 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How is "significantly worse" not different?

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

This isn't a shower thought. It's a pizza cutter being all edge and no point.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Echo chambers would have been far more effective. Algorithm curated feeds would have amplified all extremes when further. If you think fascism went too far under Mussolini, just think how that would have looked like when everyone is scrolling FearBook and upvoting @ilDuce.

On the other hand, pictures of gulags, famine and concentration camps would have leaked out a lot sooner.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 days ago

There wouldn't be meaningful changes yet there would be substantial changes?

[–] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Hitler used radio like Trump uses social media. This is not a new idea.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

There are significant differences: Radio works according to the sender-receiver model, whereas with social media, anyone can be a sender - and that is just the fundamental difference.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

If the internet existed in 1700s, the entire world would remain monarchist and feudalistic.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why though? I think the Arab spring says otherwise.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Arab Spring had other non-authoritarian/less-authoritarian countries influencing them.

Imagine it's 1700s right before french revolution. The French monarchs got access to this surveillance state we have.

Do you think the revolution would've succeeded?

I think they'd just massacre the revolutionaries with AI-powered drones.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

I was thinking of this scenario as dropping the Internet of the 1990s on a feudal system. If you used the Orwellian spy machine of the 2020s instead, it would probably get pretty dark, just as you said.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

?

Monarchism would kill your entire family for saying "Lol Emperor/King is ugly"

Even with all the oppression of the modern world in mind, our current world is still much more tame in comparison.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Kim Jong-un would do the same. And billionaires get away with abusing children, even though there is hard evidence against them. That doesn't seem like much progress to me in 400 years. Call it what you will, but the balance of power hasn't really changed all that much.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Redneck 1: Lynching at 6. You in?

Redneck 2: Hell yeah.

1933 Supreme Court states that African Americans not being allowed access to social media does not violate seperate but equal.

I feel like it's an expected consequence of living in an increasingly atomised, low trust society and not a cause.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

It would have happened exactly the same. Nothing changes with new information. History repeats itself until we all learn from it. Can't have just part of the culture or nation or society informed. It must be everyone to make a conscious effort to change.