this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
221 points (96.6% liked)

Flippanarchy

1945 readers
531 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

What would justice look like? I’m genuinely curious. There isn’t a court outside of America that can hold the president accountable, and the other option is war, which would be deadly on a massive scale. It’s insane that impeachment hasn’t happened yet, and unless the legislative branch does something to remove the cancer from the White House, then I don’t see justice being delivered.

This whole situation is a nightmare.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

There isn’t a court outside of America that can hold the president accountable

Sure there is.

Literally any country that has had one of its citizens involved in Epstein's sex trafficking can issue a warrant for Trump's arrest and prosecution as an accomplice / co-conspirator.

Why the fuck not?

If we can kidnap a President of another country, and try them, for domestic crimes... so can anyone else!

That's the precedent Trump just set.

Why respect really any international laws or norms, when it comes to the US?

We don't!

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe I'm being a bit pessimistic here, but I somehow don't see Cuba launching a massive air-sea operation to capture Trump in Mar-a-Lago while he's busy jerking off to kiddie porn with his tiny little hands.

Even some liberals are starting to see the obvious here... courts of law doesn't matter.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why respect really any international laws or norms, when it comes to the US?

Because they have big guns and they're not afraid to use them.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So do a lot of other people, now we're back to a bunch of Hobbes' Leviathans, vying for power like brutes, in the lawless 'state of nature'.

States will now increasingly just do whatever they can get away with, and still save any face that they care to save.

[–] CallMeAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Jesus, we just had to arrest all the world dictators? Well Jesus, nobody said it was so easy! Gosh we could have got Putin AGES ago!

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ah but why didn't we?

Oh, thats right.

Because laws and norms are a formality, a kind of etiquette, a masquerade, nothing more, really.

Power does whatever the fuck it wants to, justifies it however it wants to.

If it doesn't do something... it's because it doesn't want to.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

and unless the legislative branch does something to remove the cancer from the White House, then I don’t see justice being delivered

Unfortunately, this is America and it always has been. This isn't a cancer, it's the system functioning as intended and as it always has.

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Justice won't be served, but cheer up. You can also argue this is just business as usual. For example, this is not the first foreign leader the US has kidnapped. There have been a few. Fun fact: Noriega* was also kidnapped on the third of January. And hey, if Maduro is convicted for drug trafficking, maybe Trump can pardon him like he did the former drug trafficking president of Honduras.

Sure, Hegseth is an alcoholic nazi. But unlike Colin Powell, he didn't start his career in politics by whitewashing the My Lai massacre, and hasn't contributed to the death of up to 1.2 million people (yet).

And if the government of Venezuela doesn't decide to spontaneously cave and Trump does decide to send the troops in, I'm sure this particular Special Military Operation will be over in three days.

*Bit of a tangent, have you read the wikipedia article on Noriega? It's a real eye-opener. For example:

... The district court held that information about the operations in which Noriega had played a part supposedly in return for payment from the U.S. was not relevant to his defense. It ruled that "the tendency of such evidence to confuse the issues before the jury substantially outweighed any probative value it might have had." ... Information about Noriega's connections to the CIA, including his alleged contact with Bush, were kept out of the trial.

They convicted him of drug trafficking, but failed to mention to the jury that he'd also been doing it for the US government and the CIA.

TLDR: MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Never mind the fact that the only reason the CIA's boy - Noriega - came to power in Panama was thanks to the assassination of Omar Torrijos... almost certainly at the hands of the CIA.

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

His son Martín Torrijos was also president for a bit. Elected, not a dictator.

The Trump administration revoked his visa a few months ago. Basically a warning not to criticise the US government.

So I wouldn't be surprised if that's one of the next interventions. Venezuela, Cuba, Columbia, Mexico, Panama, ...

On the bright side as a European, perhaps this will keep Trump distracted for a few years, before he starts bombing Greenland and Denmark.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

It’s ~~insane~~ completely unsurprising that impeachment hasn’t happened yet

Otherwise yeah...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 21 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I don't get the use of the word "demonic". Demons aren't real, the US however, is.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

One of the things I've realized over the years is that it's so hard to talk to people about capitalism and AmeriKKKan imperialism in particular because the reality is so much more evil than the rest of humanity is able to come up with, and the actual words (e.g. capitalism) are taboo.

Like if demons were real, the AmeriKKKan capitalist class would be worse.

And IMO, it's usually a safe choice to sacrifice some precision for agitprop.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

... that's a fairly funny thing to say, from a person with the username y0kai.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even funnier that it's being called out by someone with the username being a l33t sp34k version of the word "spectral"

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, I'm all in favor of spooky, fantastic, imagery and language, with layered meanings and connotations, when appropriate.

I'm not arguing against it's use, with a mildly leet-speak version of a kind of demon/vengeful spirit from Japanese folklore, as a username.

... Do you see the difference?

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm not saying you're against it. I'm just saying it's a funny coincidence that your name is also a word for a supernatural entity related to ghosts/spirits.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Ah!

Well then, I guess we'll have to see if a shinigami or phantasm shows up, maybe a poltergeist will figure out how to work a keyboard =P

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago

They didn't call them demons, they called them demonic

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't see a problem.

The idea is to create resonance - not dot the "i"s on some secular fundamentalist check list.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Name is weirdly appropriate.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It certainly has the right... but that doesn't mean it has the ability. These creeps just waltzed in and did their dirty business just like that - I'd hate to be a member of the Venezuelan military right now.

One thing is for certain - the global south simply cannot rely on conventional militaries for protection.

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No one is safe. Not even allies.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The US doesn't have any allies - just patsies it hasn't stabbed in the back yet.

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry to break it to you, but the US has already stabbed most of its allies in the back on at least one occasion.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You "hate to break" something to me that I literally stated in the post you are responding to?

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You said US allies are "patsies it hasn’t stabbed in the back yet."

I was pointing out they (invariably) have been stabbed in the back already.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That was fundamentally implied in the statement, don't you think?

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My comment fundamentally implied it wasn't.

You're welcome.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ie, it's a you problem.

Bye.

[–] Hyperrealism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My comment fundamentally implied it was a you problem.

You're welcome. LOL

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 weeks ago

Putting the flip in flippanarchy

[–] Smookey4444@anarchist.nexus 11 points 3 weeks ago

The global south is so ruined and in so much turmoil almost exclusively due to the damage caused by powerful countries in the north

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is really unfair to those of us called demonic by our parents.

Can we rephrase this with less splash damage?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When (y)our parents say it, they are referring to actual demons though

Who also don't deserve this slander!

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh cool... it's an elephant stomping on a donkey. ... never seen that before. Fresh perspective. :)

load more comments
view more: next ›