this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
8 points (75.0% liked)

Asklemmy

52027 readers
500 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Example here

some examples include just too good views of the ‘thief’ from several angles, cars positioned suspiciously well so you can see how the paint covers the whole vehicle when the device explodes, the supposed thieves not dropping the packages when they explode, ‘thieves’ reacting the same way (oh my god, are you kidding me?, gross…).

If the paint is going to cover your own porch upon explosion you’re obviously using a paint easy to get rid of.

Even though, seems to be much work for uncertain gain, but maybe I’m wrong?

The second part of the video seems to be real though: all those thieves angrily yelling to the people they just tried stealing from, calling the police, yelling they’re going to sue, the mother stealing with her son… does it look genuine to you?

The only ones I believe are genuine are the ones with cops on them.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kylr@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Your linked example is on a channel named SoraDoorbellFootage. What they’re doing is generating a bunch of AI slop, removing the Sora watermarks, and stitching them into compilation videos for YouTube ad money.

They may not even be generating the videos themselves; they could just be compiling other peoples’ videos together. Zero cost and very little effort.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

The past was shit as well, you just were able to ignore it easier.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

They're essentially mining crypto, with ad views as the payout.

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 8 points 1 week ago

I imagine what they earn depends on how many ad impressions they get.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 6 points 1 week ago

I doubt any of them are real. It's clear to me that whoever makes these aren't even watching them first to make sure they make any sense at all. The guy just walks in after stealing? They drove a car all the way up to the front-door but there's no tracks in the snow? It's probably a fully automated setup. Or maybe this was the best out of 10 prompt attempts. It wouldn't surprise me if most videos don't break even on the AI cost, but a handful going viral and the pages/channels eventually getting subscribers from principled slop connoisseurs most likely makes this financially viable.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

People hate having their packages stolen by porch pirates.

Scumbags saw how popular Mark Rober's glitter bomb videos were and started making AI slop videos for ad money.

I'm not sure what's confusing about that.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago

The entire "porch pirate" concept is an Amazon marketing scheme

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course it's staged, theyve got blue on their face 

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They blue themselves?