this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
277 points (98.9% liked)

politics

29349 readers
1121 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The effects of DOGE’s initial blitz through the federal government – which included dismantling the US Agency for International Development (USAID), embedding staffers in almost every agency and illegally firing people en masse – are still playing out.

Contrary to Musk’s promises, DOGE’s success is vague and tough to quantify. Measuring the full impact and determining whether the agency even exists as a centralized entity anymore is difficult, complicated by an ongoing effort from the government to block disclosure of documents, which is itself a symptom of the chaos that the department created.

Although the disarray and destruction left by DOGE is evident across the globe, we still do not really know exactly how the agency operated and its true effects. Instead, humanitarian aid organizations are still trying to assess the extent of the damage that DOGE created while ethics watchdogs have launched lawsuits trying to compel more transparency out of the government.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We also know there's been no actual reduction in government spending as well.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 53 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s literally increased.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Indeed. Mostly because of starting, enabling or continuing the various unnecessary armed conflicts in the world right now.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's also almost no chance we can uncover what DOGE did in any organized way, because the people Musk brought in had complete control over the systems that would create logs and records of their changes, and assuming (pretty reasonably) they knew they were breaking rules, they almost certainly deleted and obscured what they were doing.

Doing a code audit for every governmental system seems like it should be a Week 1 item for some future non-evil administration, assuming we can get out of this timeline.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

A non-evil administration would open investigations in the House and Senate calling in every single person in and related to DOGE. (I feel stupid every time I have to type "DOGE")

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

Yes we do?

They embezzled money and fired competent workers to impose their will to cause massive damage to the democratic process.

They lied about everything and took money while doing so. This isn't a fucking question.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] halferect@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

On top of more crimes with crime on top and some treason sprinkled in for flavor

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

It cut a bunch of government programs, cancelled existing contracts, stole information and shrouded whatever it could.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Yeah we do. It was designed to fuck shit up

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We know exactly what they did. They stole. Everyone knows this.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 15 points 3 months ago

Hey, hey, hey, that's not fair. They also dismantled departments that had investigations underway to Musk's companies.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

He went after anyone investigating him . We know that at least.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

They gave palantir a direct pipeline of sensitive information tied to individuals government identity.

That's it.

[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

One thing that's safe to say is that if Musk didn't have your personal data, he does now

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago

It had no function or value beyond attempting to dismantle the federal government in an attempt to consolidate power.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They copied everyone's personal data. Look at that shining example of human integrity that is Elon musk and tell me that doesn't scare the bejeezus out of you.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

They also got rid of all the investigations into Elon Musk's companies.

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 7 points 3 months ago

Shit looks like the Cybertruck.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Something, something, something, dark enlightent

Something, something, something, anti-democracy

Something, something, something, I control the government now

-Elon Musk and other billionaires

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 5 points 3 months ago

Mission Failed Successfully.

They were sent in to “Move Fast and Break Things”. (AKA ruin everything). They did succeed this goal.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ya we do. Fuck shit up, screw the lower and middle class, benefit the rich. Done.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 4 points 3 months ago

And stole all the government data.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Fairly certain it was a limited purge

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

They had their hands in the cash drawer

[–] Pavidus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I'd so love to see that. Starting with fElon.