this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
32 points (86.4% liked)

LEGO

654 readers
110 users here now

A place to discuss Lego news, ask questions, share MOCs, and more!

Community Definitions:

[SEC] = Someone Else’s Creation

[MOC] = My Own Creation

Rules

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The BrickLink website, which now has apparently been subsumed by LEGO, requires your birth year to enter – you can't enter at all if you input a year.

I don't know you, but I refuse to give this kind of information. So bye bye BrickLink!

I contacted their customer service and told them that I'll simply avoid the BrickLink website if it requires my birth year. Their loss.

If you also disagree with this I encourage you to get in touch with them as well.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The first and best thing to remember about this sort of thing is that you don't need to give it accurate info.

I'm glad the privacy movement is so strong here on lemmy, but I feel this is pretty extreme for something so small.

Additionally, have you tried blocking that using uBlock Origin's element picker? Good chance you can do that and still use the site normally.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca -1 points 18 hours ago

Thank you for the suggestions. I simply won't use the website; I was just curious about it.

This is small indeed, but I believe that if we don't make ourselves heard, also in the small things, then they'll just do as they please.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Denmark is going bat shit crazy where shit like this is concerned. They're trying to make the EU follow suit.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 3 points 12 hours ago

Just use my birthday of January 1 1901.

[–] zachpieces@piefed.world 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

They’ve required it since September. You can enter any year from 1900 up to 18 years prior to the current date and gain access. I spam 1999 since it’s the fastest valid number for me to type. It’s tedious but I doubt they’re tracking any of this information since there is no verification and the entries are so frequent per non-signed in user.

Lego’s own website has previously also required a similar age filter in order for adults and kids to proceed to the store or to the play zone, respectively. Some sites ask if you’re over 18 because it is illegal to track certain browsing data for minors in some jurisdictions, plus Lego doesn’t want minors making purchases for toys using their parents’ credit cards.

BrickLink as a business sees itself as a marketplace first and an index second, which is why they want to ensure the users are adults in order to buy or sell. There are no ads on the site, so if you’re not already a buyer or a seller (which require you to specify your age), your boycott means just about nothing to the site.

I don’t like it, but I don’t think it’s as bad as you’re making it out to be.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It isn't a boycott really. That website means just about nothing to me as well, so I'll just avoid it. But I think it's important to put our foot down in the little things as well.

[–] zachpieces@piefed.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So bye bye BrickLink! I contacted their customer service and told them that I'll simply avoid the BrickLink website if it requires my birth year. Their loss. If you also disagree with this I encourage you to get in touch with them as well.

That’s pretty much a textbook boycott and call to action.

That website means just about nothing to me

It means enough to you for you to have made this post and to attempt to persuade others to take similar actions.

If you’re only now noticing the age filter, then you’re also not a regular enough site user for them to care if you stay or go.

There is no negative consequence to lying about your year of birth to gain access to the site. The only real problem for users is the routine moment of inconvenience.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 0 points 16 hours ago

But I think it’s important to put our foot down in the little things as well.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 20 hours ago

finally enforcing the 99 year old limit!

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Damn, I can't believe so many lego enthusiasts are 914 years old (we entering our age as 1111 on this one )

[–] fonji@sopuli.xyz 12 points 21 hours ago

1111 is invalid but 1911 works

[–] f314@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Huh.. Feels like a perfectly normal thing to ask for to get to know their audience, but demanding it is a really weird decision.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago

That's exactly the point. I'm just browsing... and a LEGO-related site! Maybe they're starting some lego-porn or lego-weapons.