Likely in exchange for ethnic cleansing place for Palestinians or a military base to bomb Yemen.
In any case the terror group controlling that area is nothing more than an Israeli and Gulf proxy.
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)
Asklemmy
51942 readers
833 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
While there has been a taboo against the changing of borders in Africa due to legitimate reasons, it became accepted that South Sudan should be created due to the destabilizing force that the Sudanese government played in the local populace. While the southern part of Somalia isn't a direct threat to Somaliland, it is obvious that there isn't a central Somali government able to enact control over Somaliland and the Somaliland government doesn't wish territorial expansion to become the legitimate government of all Somalia.
In these terms, I feel like the recognition of Somaliland isn't destabilizing to the region and seems to be a better option than continued anarchy over a wider area.
I also feel like Djibouti is trying to fight against this recognition as this gives Ethiopia another path to sea access.
While there has been a taboo against the changing of borders in Africa due to legitimate reasons, it became accepted that South Sudan should be created
Wut.
What is going on with the passive voice here? With whom has there been this taboo, and why did they think they had the power or legitimacy to define borders in the first place? The Berlin Conference? This sounds like 19th century white manβs burden shit.
There is currently only one recognized African country, Ethiopia, that recognizes Somaliland. Why only one African country? Because the others are afraid that a reevaluation of borders at best gets you something like the Partition of India at best and at worst gets you war between two countries.
This isn't white man's burden shit.