this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
199 points (100.0% liked)

News

36891 readers
3250 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. consumers were less confident in the economy in December as Americans remain anxious about still-high prices and the impact of Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs

The Conference Board said Tuesday that its consumer confidence index fell 3.8 points to 89.1 in December from November’s upwardly revised reading of 92.9. That is close to the 85.7 reading from April, when Trump rolled out his import taxes on U.S. trading partners.

A measure of Americans’ short-term expectations for their income, business conditions and the job market remained stable at 70.7, but still well below 80, the marker that can signal a recession ahead. It was the 11th consecutive month that reading has come in under 80.

The country’s labor market has been stuck in a “low hire, low fire” state, economists say, as businesses stand pat due to uncertainty over Trump’s tariffs and the lingering effects of elevated interest rates. Since March, job creation has fallen to an average 35,000 a month, compared to 71,000 in the year ended in March. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said recently that he suspects those numbers will be revised even lower.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 51 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Something that caught my attention. I ordered two random, non-Christmas items on Monday. I fully expected not to see them until later this week or next week. Much to my surprise, they’re out for delivery today.

The sheer fact I could order something 3 days before Christmas and have it arrive on Christmas Eve tells me that shipping rates are much lower this year than they have been in years past, which means people aren’t ordering the same amount they used to.

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

I had this same thought when my should-be-next-Saturday deliveries showed up yesterday.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Two things we ordered over a week ago were supposed to be delivered yesterday but now say the 27th. So YMMV I guess.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mine came via FedEx. Were yours USPS?

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

One Fedex one UPS. Another Fedex package that was supposed to be here last week only got here yesterday.

My guess is that they hired more people in traditionally heavy areas so that there it’s going faster but in flyover country it’s business as usual.

[–] mystrawberrymind@piefed.ca 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Anecdotal, but my friend who’s a teacher noticed that while he usually gets tons of Christmas cards and gifts from his students, this year not so much. It’s like an indicator for the economy. People seem to be less festive and/or are having to cut costs this year.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I've seen a lot more talk about Prices than the other notable impact of Tariffs: the highest number of Layoffs since the Pandemic and loss of manufacturing jobs across the USA.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Those are intertwined though.

More people losing income makes the impact of rising prices even more noticeable for a larger portion of households.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's possible for the price of goods to change independently of number of well paying jobs.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 3 months ago

It's unlikely to change as drastically without it, though.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 1 points 3 months ago

I wasn't saying that fewer jobs was the cause of increasing prices.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago

They are blaming AI for that, which is surprising since not one of those jobs was actually replaced with AI.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

The flip flopping and lies from media is so disgusting right now. First I hear BEST rebound, people shopping more than two years ago! Then I hear no one can afford shit. So which is it???

Media, get your nose outta the orange cancer ass and DO YOUR JOB--- report the truth. Ugh.