this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
154 points (98.7% liked)

News

36912 readers
3159 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has said the US will keep or sell the crude oil contained on tankers it has seized off the coast of Venezuela, as well as the vessels themselves.

The US president's comments came as Washington continues to pressure the South American country's leader Nicolás Maduro to stand down.

Speaking to reporters in Florida on Monday, Trump said of the oil "we're going to keep it", adding: "Maybe we will sell it, maybe we will keep it. Maybe we'll use it in the Strategic Reserves. We're keeping the ships also."

The Trump administration has accused Venezuela of using oil revenues to fund drug-related crime, while Caracas has condemned the seizures as "piracy".

The US military has seized two oil tankers this month, including one on Saturday.

Trump issued his latest warning as the US Coast Guard continued to pursue a third oil tanker, which authorities described as part of a Venezuelan "dark fleet" used to evade US sanctions.

"It's moving along, and we'll end up getting it," Trump said.

Separately on Monday, the US military said it carried out a strike on what it said was a suspected trafficking vessel in international waters in the eastern Pacific. US Southern Command said one person was killed.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bklyn@piefed.social 65 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Someone had pointed out when all this started, this is a privateer, pirating with the sanction of a government. Not honest pirating. ;)

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Isn't privateering still done by a privately owned ship? Pretty sure when government vessels do it, it is just a blockade/sanctions enforcement/etc, until someone declares war about it.

[–] bklyn@piefed.social 5 points 3 months ago

well, then I'd like to see their Letter of Marque... ;)

I remember hearing this, too

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

That's if you're hired by the government. This is official government agents doing it.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

*nazis. don’t disparage pirates like that. this is trump toying with manufactured consent and hoping another tonkin happens.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For the second time in less than 24 hrs...

Gee, who the fuck could have predicted that was coming? Russia and China pledge support for Venezuela as Trump ratchets up pressure on Maduro

And by "we" will keep or sell, I assume he means the royal We, as in Chevron, since he's ensured they are currently the only company allowed to legally export oil from Venezuela.

Chevron is, I think, the largest single producer of oil and gas in Venezuela at this time. They apparently have what we call a specific license from the Department of Treasury to continue operations there, whereas a lot of other companies don’t have that privilege. There used to be a general license that enabled a lot of companies to operate there. Those were revoked by the Trump administration during summertime. And again, those specific licenses aren’t public, so we don’t know the details. But we can surmise that Chevron does have one of those undisclosed specific licenses because we see in the numbers production from Chevron, and we see barrels flowing each week to the United States.

This is all on the heels of the U.S. placing "sanctions" on the Russian oil company, LukOil, and the rejection of Chevron's bid to buy those assets.

Essentially, the deal was going to be a cashless sale back to Lukoil securities held by U.S. investors in exchange for the company's global assets

Luckily, to avoid any potential fuckery and corruption regarding the assets, Saudi Arabia stepped in instead. Saudi Arabia Moves to Take Control of LUKOIL’s $22 Billion Global Assets

And even though Chevron didn't get to "buy" those assets (at least not directly) they get to take control of all of the shadow tankers that were headed to Russia, China, and Iran. Russia had been using these ghost tankers to sneak around EU sanctions, but then started marking their tankers with Russian flags... for some reason.

The “shadow fleet” used by Russia, Iran and Venezuela to avoid western sanctions and ship cargo to customers including China and India is “exploding” in its scale and scope, and there are concerns that efforts to counter it are drawing closer to dangerous military confrontations. Complicating the issue is that Russia has begun putting its own flag on some former shadow fleet tankers, in an open challenge to Europe.

Is it a challenge? Or is it like writing your name on something because you know your friends will be raiding the fridge, and you want to mark what belongs to you?

[–] trslim@pawb.social 32 points 3 months ago

they're fucking criminals and they are in charge of the fucking Whitehouse. America is so fucked.

[–] Dhs92@piefed.social 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is he pushing them to strike US soil first so he can avoid officially declaring war?

Honestly, wouldn't even be surprised. Every modern day endless war needs a false flag attack to get the patriotic vitriol pumping.

And normally, that's something you do when support for your administration isn't already so fucking low it seems like it couldn't possibly get any lower, and oh my God how can we seriously not even be one year in at this point, what tf does he have planned to create the illusion of a united front against a threat to America?

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

OotL.

What authority does the US (think they) have to seize these ships?

All I have seen is vague references to "sanctions" with no further explanation.

There might be drugs? Or is that just to attack ships?

They're lawless thugs who are out to get rich and daring anyone to try and stop them whether sea or land.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Arr... they be ruining my romantic view of pirates as swashbuckling anti-heroes!

[–] Auk@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

As long as it’s benefiting him personally, I’m ok with it.