Looks like it's this.
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
19 points (95.2% liked)
Asklemmy
51905 readers
514 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Thank you! Regards from Poland hehe
I can't pinpoint the exact unit, but that's an A-37B Dragonfly on the patch. It'd be sometime between the 70s and 80s.
Do you have a larger/better quality image of this?
No
~~Do you have some context that could help narrow it down?~~
Edit: Nevermind, Lemmy just got it like that. Wow.
2x upscale
Upscalers usually don't have context for text or smaller graphics, so the patches don't look much better. Hopefully OP can provide a better source.
Yeah thatβs fine, but by doing so someone else will have an easier time recognizing the image or matching the details to their memory
If the upscaler was trained on data that contains that exact patch in other contexts, it'll theoretically be capable of upscaling it properly.
Is it just me or does this look like a photoshop/Ai as the badge on his arm doesn't contour to his name like a sewn or iron-on badge would??
If it's thick enough, then it won't bend that easily. Depends entirely on the badge.
But it should be attached to his sleeve...
I'm not certain that it isn't attached. The fabric might be folded in underneath the badge in a way that makes it seem like the badge isn't completely attached. The shoulder is a place where the fabric will fold, especially if its folding is constrained by a stiff badge at one spot, causing more folding right next to it.
Alternatively it could be that the badge is partially off, with one side having detached due to the stresses of the fabric folding around under it, or it could be on purpose to preserve mobility in the shoulder. The shoulder is also a prime place to snag on something and for the badge to be partially torn off. This is an unfortunately common occurence with student overalls here...
Unless you mean that the badge is in the wrong place alltogether, I don't see any glaring issue here.
Possible but with no other evidence I would reserve judgemtof this man