this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
9 points (90.9% liked)

Linux

14594 readers
42 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see these two as the main search results

Anybody here who has tried both care to give a comparison? I'm on Fedora 43 and have been using Flatpaks quite a bit over the old 3rd party yum/dns repo method for supplemental stuff like this. I guess that gives Packet a bit of an edge for now, as the rquickshare dev uses a 3rd party framework that doesn't yet support Flatpaks. But if the consensus is that rquickshare is better then grabbing the RPM directly is an option.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] jared@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I usually send stuff with kde connect.

[โ€“] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I did look at GS connect since I'm using GNOME, but some of the user reviews are saying to doesn't work with F43 yet. Also I'm not looking to have to install anything on new my phone for this, since the phone already has native tooling to do wireless file transfer.