this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
17 points (77.4% liked)

Space

2038 readers
12 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The article seems wrong on a couple of counts.

Two stars colliding does not create a supernova.

A white dwarf that consumes matter from a companion may eventually result in a type-1a supernova. But that’s not the same thing as two stars colliding.

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Bad science reporting as usual. I read the study and it doesn’t even hint at collision as a possible outcome of the binary system. It’s a potentially special system for study, but not because we are going to see stars collide or anything.

Also “solved” is wrong. They presented a potential answer that needs more study.