this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
745 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

10152 readers
2874 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’d like my taxes to help people in need. Unfortunately my taxes go towards skeletonizing brown children.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

And abducting local brown people and unmarked vans.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t even mind if my taxes go to people that don’t contribute back and just watch tv and drink beer all day if that keeps them off the street. I’d rather they don’t contribute than anti-contribute.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

go to people that don’t contribute back

you mean billionaires?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

No, those are the anti-contributors

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 month ago

Yus.

Sensible anti-degeneracy approach.

And gets better than that... especially when ceasing blocks to them bettering themselves and their ability to help others however they can. Then the support given to them proliferates to benefit each and all.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago (14 children)

A top marginal tax rate of 94% for people making over $1,000,000 USD per year is just common sense under capitalism. Spending it on those who need it instead of genocide is what’s controversial.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Very few people have income (salary) that high. What's needed is higher capitals gains and wealth taxes, to avoid loopholes and living from credits against stock.

[–] Trying2KnowMyself@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Fixing capitalism is a lost cause. What’s needed is a feast where we eat the rich.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't mind if my taxes feed and house people, even people who just moved here. Those are good goals and produce real products.

I do mind if all my taxes are used for unaccountable military organizations that are used to violate people's rights and harrass the poor and the vulnerable. Those are stupid goals and produce nothing of value.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are you sure you don't want your taxes going to subsidizing billionaires and bankers instead?

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Israel needs tens of billions to commit genocide and war

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

CanIthinkaboutitnothanks

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That silly ~~communist~~ ~~socialist~~ ~~just being a decent member of society~~ ~~not an asshole~~ ~~compassionate human being~~ regular ass member of society is at it a again.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My county arranged for school lunches to be free. Free for all the kids. It's a pittance to pay in taxes and it scales all the way up to but not including the 1%ers. If you're poor enough to need it, chances are you're paying very little for it.

The right-wing shitheads in the county are citing that as overreach and trying to get it cut down.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like tracking these people down and cementing the words "Starving children makes me happy" to their cybertrucks or whatever would be appropriate.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

That would be truly satisfying, but i doubt they'd get it. So deep in the brainwashing they'd prob say it would force their parents to get out and find better work.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I feel like I've seen this on my Lemmy frontpage at least 4 times in the last month

[–] Nanook@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Consistent messaging, nicely done everyone!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

Well most people don't mind. It's just the vocal minority who really care. But they tend to be who governments pander too because they are the ones who pay the ~~bribes~~ contributions.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The best way to abolish all those poor people is actually giving them a richer future.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 5 points 1 month ago

Poverty is expensive for us all.

Best end it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only reason I want more money is to pay more taxes. I wanna walk around the city like "Yea, you like that park bench? Me too! You're very welcome! Hey, check out that bus! Looking good, right? Guess who paid for one 200000th of that? [points two thumbs at self like a total douche] THIS GUY!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

62% of American voters support higher minimum wage, for example.

It doesn't matter.

There's no money to be made off of feeding the homeless. If Amazon doesn't want it, it won't be done. They sign the checks.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Fuck up part your taxes could go down and we still could feed everyone. The military and now ICE get a majority of our tax dollars.

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

I knew the style was familiar. Norman Rockwell is iconic.

[–] Jimjim@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ive only experienced 1 homeless shelter, and it wasnt even "government funded" it just didnt pay taxes

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just thinking hypotheticals, but what would happen if people could vote the percent of their own taxes would go. So you could choose the buckets where your own tax would go…

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then things that weren't acceptable by people who can't think of priorities in a large system would be left aside. The point of voting in representatives is you vote in people who can have a better idea of what is needed in various areas.

Mean that's not always the case but way better than Joe Blow deciding all his taxes go to the military rather than education.

Mean I see the appeal but that voting has to come from informed voters with proper reasoning skills. Since we're in an age of propoganda nothing essential would ever be funded, people are too easily swayed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›