this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
194 points (97.5% liked)

politics

26814 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Nancy Mace has ripped Speaker Mike Johnson for the way he has run the House of Representatives in a New York Times op-ed, the latest sign of discontent among Republicans with the speaker.

Mace, a former moderate who moved hard to the right who is now running for governor, criticized Johnson and House leadership for closing the lawmaking process and concentrating it among themselves.

“Would opening up the floor lead to more conservative bills passing or more bipartisan ones? The honest answer is: It would do both,” she wrote.

“Some Republican priorities would finally get a vote. So, too, would common-sense bipartisan measures. The point is to do more and let voters see where their representatives stand. What we have now is the worst of all worlds: little accountability, transparency and results.”

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago

Republicans believe government cannot and will not work. Elect them and they will show you. 😉

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not like the Republicans set a high bar. Pelosi barely cleared it.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You might disagree with her policies but she was one of the absolute best at being speaker and getting votes.

[–] lunelovegood@ttrpg.network 4 points 2 weeks ago

and getting votes

Votes for what? Compromise isn't intrinsically good.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Pelosi stood on top of a pile of money she insider-traded on to top that bat

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Truly heartbreaking.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pelosi was a good politician. That doesn't make her a good person. She fleeced millions from insider stock trading in her position of power.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Good politician in terms of behaving like a politician, maybe. In terms of serving her constituents? Nah.

[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Good politician is generally taken to mean good at corralling the other politicians into passing your agendas, at least how I usually see it use. Like how people call McConnell a "good" politician . Idk tho

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah that's pretty much what I meant. Good at playing the game, not great at representing the people. Like most politicians.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

She was very effective at using her inside knowledge to trade on the stock market.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Funny, I didn’t think it could really get worse than Pelosi until Johnson showed up.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you thought Kevin McCarthy was better than Nancy Pelosi?

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hah, no, of course not. There’s been many horrible speakers.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hastert was a child molester. Boehner and Ryan were nothing to get excited about, either.

And then there is Newt, who bears responsibility for so much that is awful about our political situation these days.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, you’re right, they’re all horrible.

[–] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Of all her crimes, that outfit might be near the top.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago

That outfit says, "I need mental health help", and also "Notice ME!!!".

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Looks like she's getting ready to enter the fire temple.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Why? Because she can count? Because she can be stern to her caucus and get them to STFU?

She took impeachment off the table for Bush.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow, this century is a long time. Nope, just 25 years. Wait, 25 years? Y2K wasn’t that long ago, was it?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No. It was 26 years ago, because we were handling it in the run-up to 2000, not the following December.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Jan 1, 2000 was almost 26 years ago..

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s like they put two balloons in a pink dress and stuck two pvc pipes underneath

Huh. Here I am sort of agreeing with Nancy Mace.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

Nobody asked what you think Nancy

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Apparently she ran out of people willing to shake her hand.