this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

Public Health

1244 readers
47 users here now

For issues concerning:


🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Does the US not practice basic food safety? (answer: no, it doesn't)

I did some contracting for an NZ food manufacturer and EVERYTHING went through a metal detector after the packaging was sealed. It was regularly tested with a 0.5mm metal ball cast into a brick of some kind of acrylic/epoxy.

The later line had an x-ray too.

But regulations like that would mean a 0.0004% decrease in profits! Are you mad!?!

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

For a real answer, instead of the usual Internet and "US bad" useless comments... yeah things like metal detectors and X-rays are pretty standard for a lot of food manufacturing.

However, just because things are standard, and even installed and used, that doesn't guarantee that it issues are noticed immediately. Things do fail, sometimes silently depending on the design, and that might not be noticed immediately, or employees on the line ignore issues instead of dealing with them. Sometimes, things are just caused by laziness or incompetence, not for intentional reasons.

And sometimes it's just a difference in who's expected to verify quality at various stages of processing a product. If the final processor and packager isn't likely to cause a particular issue via their equipment and process, they might not check for those issues, instead expecting their suppliers to do so before they get the material. Like if the final company just puts packages the final product in plastic, they might not be checking for metal fragments because their equipment doesn't have any risk of doing that. And the previous suppliers might not be checking because they expect the final company to check the end product is after all processing. So the end result is no one actually checked for it.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Anecdotally, I can imagine a situation where a line worker feared for their job if they stopped production to tell their manager about a problem. So they kicked the proverbial can down the road hoping somebody else would deal with it.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You don’t know at all, do you?

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 2 points 5 days ago

???

It's basic QA.

Bag it, metal detector, check weigher, throw it in a box, send some samples off to QA to swab for bugs and check for seal leaks.

That was bread but I doubt cheese is massively different.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 8 points 5 days ago

Good & Gather, Great Value, Publix, Sprouts and Happy Farms.

Walmart, Target, and Aldi.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Eh, that's what you get for buying pre shredded cheese.