this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

4831 readers
451 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s not every day a video codec wins an Emmy. But yesterday, the Television Academy honored the AV1 specification with a Technology & Engineering Emmy Award, recognizing its impact on how the world delivers video content.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Hopefully they will fix the encode speed with AV2. You need a super computer to encode AV1 in a reasonable amount of time. H.265 is significantly faster for a similar quality.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, you generally decode an asset several magnitudes more often than encoding it, and decoding basically must happen real-time, while encoding can most often happen ahead-of-time. Having encodes be a bit on the slower side if it gains you higher compression is arguably worth it.

[–] who@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

encoding can most often happen ahead-of-time.

If you're counting in terms of viewer hours, then sure. However, given the rise of Twitch-style live broadcasts, I think the picture would be noticeably different if you were to count programming hours instead. High quality real-time encoding is becoming much more widely relevant.

[–] ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

no one wants to pay royalties to mpeg consortium

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, but I don't want to wait a day or more for a movie to encode either.

[–] ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

get a gpu that can encode av1

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 days ago

Isn’t that orders of magnitude more expensive than paying a royalty?

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

It sucks on CPU, but for GPU encode even cheapest Intel Arc cards can chew through it with no problem.