this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
128 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26546 readers
2501 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Move marks president’s latest effort to dismantle pollution regulations and support for cleaner-running vehicles

Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he is repealing the Biden-era federal fuel economy standards, significantly weakening fuel efficiency requirements for tens of millions of new gasoline-powered cars and light trucks.

It marks the US president’s latest effort to dismantle pollution regulations and federal support for cleaner-running vehicles and renewable energy. Burning gasoline is a significant contributor to global heating and transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States.

“We are officially terminating Joe Biden’s ridiculously burdensome, horrible actually, Cafe standards that imposed expensive restrictions,” Trump said in an Oval Office announcement, flanked by top auto executives including the CEOs of Ford and Stellantis. “It put tremendous upward pressure on car prices, combined with the insane electric vehicle mandate.”

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 47 minutes ago

So the plan is to sell inbred rednecks thirstier trucks, while gasoline demand is decreasing and will become a niche product in a decade.

Enjoy your $300 fillups boys.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Trumps got to keep those angry older white guys driving lifted blacked out trucks with a sticker of a little kid peeing on something happy.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

"I want to destroy the world quicker because think of all the shareholder value we can create along the way"

Its really fucked up man. I'm not a communist at all but I start to understand why people would want to go the complete opposite way of this system.

Its basically "I don't give a fuck how many people die or even if we destroy the entire world in the process I just want to generate more money for the people at the 'top'" and its really sad.

There's absolutely no reason to do this, other than generate more money at the expense of the citizens and the entire planet.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Fuel efficiency—the measurement for getting more mileage out of the same amount of gasoline. Congratulations, MAGA voters, you played yourself! When you pick up that new pile of trash made by Ford or Stellantis (and I know you will because they're AMERICAN* cars), I hope you enjoy the higher gas expenses that you voted for.

* With the extra irony being that many of those "American" brands are owned by Stellantis, which isn't even headquartered anywhere in North America.

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

They already played themselves by picking the 'American' vehicles. They are all trash and hard to work on.

The Japanese ones are really the only ones built for longevity and ease of maintenance.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

But Genocide Joe or some shit

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah, but car makers will still adhere to the intentional standard, since the intentional market is what they can profit from the most

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Depends. I don't think we are exporting a whole lot of SUVs and pickups...especially big body-on-frame SUVs.

CAFE standards already killed the small/midsize car market. Automakers have all their chips in the SUV/CUV segment, because they are in the same category as giant trucks, and thus they improve the average fuel economy.

That, combined with the fact that Trump doesn't do anything for the heck of it. Somebody is gaining (or at least planning to gain) from this (besides him)...makes me think that this will have significant negative impacts for the environment.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 4 points 12 hours ago

I'm not sure there are many body on frame SUVs left.

And the "same category as trucks" has more to do with safety standards. Fuel economy has to do with wheelbase; the way the math works out, it's easier to build a less fuel efficient massive vehicle than a more fuel efficient small one.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Unfortunately, the EU is about to partly cave on that* for lesser tariffs. I can't believe this is happening.

* at least security in SUVs; not sure about emissions. Hopefully not, but the agreement does not specify.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

This is for the average across the fleet.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

National standards might change, but I’m betting California and some other states will still hold car manufacturers to a higher standard.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

Just tax fuel more and let math do the work. Europeans are shifting to EVs because environment? It's because gasoline is $7.50 a gallon and they can do math.

[–] Bristlecone@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Reasonable, but this shit still fucking pisses me off

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago

Just another horrible thing in a long line of horrible things both Trump admins have done. Wrt climate action, leaving the Paris Agreement was the big one. After that, this - perversely - feels like par for the course.

Cafe standards

Not familiar with that turn of phrase ... oh, it's another acronym: CAFE