this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26546 readers
2501 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Washington state lawmakers next year hope to rein in law enforcement’s use of automated license plate readers amid revelations federal immigration authorities are using the data.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 day ago

WA state best state.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have recently learned that these readers have about 5 pounds of copper in them. Just saying …

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Hunh. I wonder what that's worth to some enterprising few.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 23 hours ago

A few ounces of gold on all the gold plated components.

[–] EnderLaw@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“A lot of this risk goes away if you ensure that the data is deleted,” Sannon said. “It can’t fall into the wrong hands. It can’t be requested or misused if it’s just being regularly deleted.”

Yeah.

That data will be deleted.

For sure.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“We deleted it but the law says nothing about extensive backups of backups we forgot about in cold storage oopsie daisy uwu!”

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Washington blue super majority:

"Ban license plate readers because they are being used by ICE or put more in because the plate reader companies paid us off... Tough call."

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Speaking from another big west coast city where people are debating these things - lot of the pro-flock folks are people in the more well-to-do areas that want to get tough on crime.

They don’t like that suburban burglaries and car break ins are a lower priority for police. Cops in big cities are usually prioritizing the nastier crimes, not low value smash and grabs that are damn near impossible to solve.

People in the nicer areas throw money into cameras and private security, then the camera and security companies give the residents a bunch of bad data that shows their product is working through correlation, not causation. Then the residents become proponents for solutions that often have pretty poor efficacy when you look at non-industry data.

These security companies have a playbook. I imagine there are hundreds of other cities in the exact same spot.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup you nailed it. That's exactly our problem up here. A lot of affluent cities like Redmond were mentioned were quick to adopt these cameras and they did nothing to help with the crime issues but the security companies did a great job selling it and continue to do so as more cities here are adopting them faster ever day.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IMHO, flock really benefited from the pandemic crime leveling out. People have been returning to pre-pandemic habits, and the inflated crime has naturally gone down everywhere. But now flock can show a lot of 2022 to 2025 data to people, and they think the product makes them safe.

Flock could’ve hung furbies instead of cameras, and crime would still be down considerably.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everyone knows furby was a fed.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

I thought it was a CCP plant?