this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

US News

2419 readers
48 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The investor has also claimed the way Nvidia’s graphics chips are accounted for is incorrect, claiming they have a much shorter use life than has been suggested.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] durduramayacaklar@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

five steps of the grief is just started

[–] Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

It’s kind of funny seeing people cope that ai “isn’t a bubble” or “it’s totally fine” meanwhile ai hasn’t done anything really

[–] sodium_nitride@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The investor has also claimed the way Nvidia’s graphics chips are accounted for is incorrect, claiming they have a much shorter use life than has been suggested.

Last month, he revealed bets against Nvidia and Palantir of more than $1bn (£760m), allowing him to make a significant profit if the stock fell.

Everyone in this whole ordeal is a scammer one way or another. Whether they bet on AI or against it.

[–] Darkcommie@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

I can’t tell if the guy genuinly believes it or hes just grifting and hoping ai stock crashed

[–] Jarmund@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago

Currently re-reading Lenin's imperialism and oh boy reading the headline send me on big laughter session

[–] ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago

Well we know your not Enron, we are asking in Nvidia is part of a Bubble, please answer the question

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 8 points 2 weeks ago

“I am not a crook”

[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

In some ways it is not a bubble. Because the presumption behind a bubble is that there is an acceptable baseline in capitalism. There isn't. Bubbles popping is just the boom and bust cycles. Every boom cycle in capitalism could be considered a "bubble"; the inflation of asset prices of (fictious or otherwise) capital propped up by labour. There is not a real division between finance capital and "industrial" capital; they are two sides of the same coin (yeah Michael Hudson is wrong, good stepping stone but I have outgrown him now as an ML).

Having said that, that's not the paradigm Nvidia is working with. The fact that he had to say it out aloud is hilarious.

[–] King_Simp@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'd argue that bubbles are specific events causing a bust cycle [panic of 1819, crash of 1929, etc] of large proportions. Bust cycles are natural, but bubbles and depression/great recessions usually only happen once in a while

[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Bust cycles are natural

I would start with an examination of that presumption (I mean that sincerely).

[–] Maeve1@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Lesser "bubbles" bursting are usually called "corrections."

[–] Riffraffintheroom@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

I mean Tesla has had a massively inflated stock value for 10+ years. Is there a chance this ball can be kept in the air through pixie dust and the power of belief?