this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)
US News
2419 readers
47 users here now
News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In some ways it is not a bubble. Because the presumption behind a bubble is that there is an acceptable baseline in capitalism. There isn't. Bubbles popping is just the boom and bust cycles. Every boom cycle in capitalism could be considered a "bubble"; the inflation of asset prices of (fictious or otherwise) capital propped up by labour. There is not a real division between finance capital and "industrial" capital; they are two sides of the same coin (yeah Michael Hudson is wrong, good stepping stone but I have outgrown him now as an ML).
Having said that, that's not the paradigm Nvidia is working with. The fact that he had to say it out aloud is hilarious.
I'd argue that bubbles are specific events causing a bust cycle [panic of 1819, crash of 1929, etc] of large proportions. Bust cycles are natural, but bubbles and depression/great recessions usually only happen once in a while
I would start with an examination of that presumption (I mean that sincerely).
Lesser "bubbles" bursting are usually called "corrections."