this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

3441 readers
228 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Look to the insurance companies to figure risk, it's what they do. It's like global warming, if it's not real, why are insurance companies pulling back?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 13 hours ago

maybe ai can figure out the liability numbers /s

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This is interesting as I've heard of some AI insurance companies popping up to provide coverage for the risk in AI models.

It seems like a very difficult area to properly cover as there is no set attack surface so it's hard to know what risk you're taking on by integrating AI.

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah I thought the entire premise was the legal risks alone are effectively unlimited at this point in time.

[–] Lugh@futurology.today 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

An irony here is I heard about this via an AI newsletter I subscribe to. It supports itself by selling ads for AI companies. The ad beside this story was AI-generated & touted a company called Genarena that sells AI-generated infographics. The example was a "Top 10 Liveable Global Cities", where the No 1 & No 2 spot were the same city ........

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 2 points 9 hours ago

I thought they could do text now lmao. I genuinely miss when this was all AI was doing because at least it was good for a laugh instead of creating arguably the largest economic buble to ever exist.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

There are so many things wing with that infographic. I can't believe someone saw that and approved it.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago

This is for paying out when an A"I" fucks up. They want the rules to change so they dont have to do that. They still want to use it against people.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

I wasn't aware that they couldn't add that to their renewable terms. I'm actually surprised about that