this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
49 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

4613 readers
94 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So that explains why MenuLog closed down. “If we are expected to actually pay people to work, our business model is not sustainable”.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Menulog as far as I am aware, at least in my area, didn't have their own drivers. They were the restaurant's drivers

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Canada has already been doing this in some places for over a year now.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

California is doing this too, so "world's first" also confused me. The California version requires Doordash, Uber Eats, etc to pay 120% of the minimum wage for each hour the driver is working (from when they accept an order to when it's delivered, excluding waiting time), plus 35 cents per mile for miles driven during deliveries.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

That's interesting. I wonder why they're calling it "world first" then. I can think of three main possibilities:

  1. There's some nuance here in the specifics. Like maybe the Canadian version has minimum pay but not insurance, or vice versa? Or the way the pay rate is set is different?[^1]
  2. That "in some places" caveat you added. "World first" for it to be national, instead of done at the provincial level, maybe?
  3. Sheer bluster. Made up. Not true.

[^1]: For better, or for worse. For example, maybe in Canada the following is not true: "The deal does not include penalty rates for things such as working late at night and, Veen says, the minimum hourly rate does not apply to time spent waiting between delivery jobs."