this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
843 points (97.5% liked)

politics

26445 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumbass@piefed.social 21 points 3 days ago

Of course Nazis don't think the Nazi symbol is a hate symbol.

That would be like me saying the weed leaf image is a hate symbol.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

"Divisive."

I mean, COME ON guys, lets just meet halfway. They wear swastikas and SS uniforms, and you don't complain anymore, it's called COMPROMISE.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"Don't you see? Those people find civil rights offensive too! Why don't we just compromise and only call klan hoods "divisive" rather than "hateful." That will solve the issue!"

7wl4vDjUFDGFFNq.png

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago

How long before this becomes the official flag of the United States?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 3 days ago

"Opinion is divided on the subject. All the other captains say it is. I say it isn't."

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 days ago

Good! MORE Swastikas LESS Rainbows!

-NOT Nazis!

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

They’re not “proto-fascists” anymore you naive lemmyworlders.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

How else are they going to hire people? Most guys that want to sign up are all tatted with these symbols.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They didn't go so far to include the Confederate flag yet. I guess that hits closer to home still, even though the two can sometimes be seen together.

The sign of a true idiot is when they fly either of these beside the US flag.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It is not divisive and it is a hate symbol.

[–] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This will be changed after Trump is removed.

[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I actually don't think Trump is behind this one. hear me out:

there are two factions emerging within MAGA. the Evangelicals and MAGA-leaning neocons are heavily Zionist, so there's no way they'd let this happen. the second faction are the alt-right/groypers/white nationalists, who simp for Nick Fuentes and Laura Loomer. Gen Z belongs overwhelmingly to this second camp, as illustrated by the Young Republicans discord leak.

Trump himself has no political views other than his own power and personal vengeance, but I'd still put him closer to the first camp since he's a Boomer, and he's in Bibi's pocket. so I think whoever pushed for this is probably part of the same cabal that posts Nazi dogwhistles on DHS's Twitter - part of the second camp.

and that second camp will become the future of the Republican party, unfortunately.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I'm floored we are getting pro zionist nazis this go around.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If you read between the lines, this is the clearest sign to date how much they're struggling with recruiting for the armed forces.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›