this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
537 points (99.1% liked)

Games

43372 readers
2404 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just minutes before it was set to deliver its financial results for the first half of its 2025-26 fiscal year, Ubisoft mashed the brakes on the whole thing, postponing the release of its results to an unspecified future date. The company also requested that European exchange Euronext halt trading of the company's shares and bonds from November 14 until the publication of its results.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today 81 points 2 days ago

They know. They're done, and that's that.

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

This exactly what happens when you rely on rhetoric, instead of you know, making games that people like.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Ubisoft trading community are coping to justify holding on to their tanking investments. It's a gambler doubling down on losing.

Christ, how the mighty Ubisoft has fallen. They will go the way of EA and become a spyware company for the decadent Arab royals. I'm just crying that Ubisoft made some of my favourite games growing up and look what they have done to my boy-- a rotting zombie 🥲

[–] MyNameIsAtticus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's disappointing. I've been going through some of their older catalog recently and it just has a lot more passion behind it i feel.

AC Shadows felt like when i write an essay, where i get really motivated at the start, completely drop off and try to stuff the middle with as much as possible to reach the page count, then get motivated again at the end just to finish the conclusion. They always had their bugs, but lately it's felt soulless.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the Ubisoft trading community that I mentioned, some folks blamed UbiSoft's downfall for "being woke". As if Ubisoft's blind chasing of money, abandoning most of their IP, selling broke products, and last but not least an executive telling consumers to get used to not owning games are not bigger factors.

[–] msage@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

Ubisoft has been shit for a very long time.

I still recoil from the memory of Far Cry 3 dropping in the middle of the game because thier launcher had an issue, three times in one hour. Which reset my progress. Uninstall, never bought shit from them again.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They should use prices of $200, 250, and 300 instead of the $70, 110, and 130 AAA reskinned games. That would work. /s

[–] meisterah@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 day ago

I like the way you think.

Charge the morons as much as they're willing to pay!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

A lot of very confused people here who think an earnings delay means ubi havent made much money. Cant say if they have or not, but if they havent thats still not a reason for this kind of delay

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Too late to short it I guess

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What did they screw up recently?

[–] the_strange@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The most recent release is probably Anno 117 which came out yesterday. While decently looking it's lacking features of the previous title (like coop mode and mod browser) with the promise they will be added later and is priced at around 60€ or 90€ if you want to gamble on the quality of the promised to be released DLC. They also relied on AI generated images in some of the assets used in the game instead of paying their artists. Optimisation for the game seems to be ok, but not great but it might be too early to judge that fully yet.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That seems like way too recent to have any impact, though. It wouldn't even have made it into their report data

[–] the_strange@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They tried to build a lot of hype around the game and get people to preorder. Maybe those numbers were (far) below expectations?

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 day ago

I don't think that alone would justify this move, even if they didn't sell a single pre-order.

[–] caut_R@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don‘t get why they’d cheap out on artists, a couple people drawing illustrations is surely not gonna balloon development cost - and arguably one of the easiest places to spot when it‘s AI slop. It‘s as if they think there must be gen AI stuff in the game somewhere or the game‘s worse or something.

[–] the_strange@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

If you look at the older titles, there's so much love and passion that went into the artworks. 1404 is 16 years old and has aged incredibly well, because of the high quality of the work that went into it. This is missing in 117.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Klear@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What didn't they screw up?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't really answer the question for people like me who didn't follow their every action

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Uh-oh! Wait, you already said that.

Ruh-roh!

Sounds like their recent games that they claimed did so well probably didn't actually, and that's about to be a massive problem.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›