this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
210 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26399 readers
2870 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We keep handing Dems every win we can, and they keep squandering it.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

Some are taking those wins and passing progressives policies at the state level, but I completely agree regarding Dems in the Federal Senate.

[–] Lennny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zack is trump and ally is the GOP as a whole

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I bet Ally has a better Trump though.

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

really big shoes

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It's not squandering when it's done deliberately.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, wins except for, like, president and congress and a bunch of stuff. There we told them we couldn't be bothered.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That was after giving them the win with Biden, and letting them squander that too, but I getcha.

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah to be fair Utah is already so gerrymandered it won't make much difference.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Picking up a seat is a good thing. The house is tight.

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh agreed completely, I'm just cynical about Utah politics from living here so many years.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, if means anything, cutting Salt Lake dems out will only make the new conservative district less moderate. So you’ve got more polarization to look forward to.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uh, yeah, and the judge agreed and changed that?

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You misunderstand, it is already massively gerrymandered and I'm certainly glad it's not getting worse, but it's already a very broken state politically.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So you're talking about other maps, probably for state-level races? I guess, but for those who live in the 49 states other than Utah this is literally the only map that can affect things outside of Utah by flipping a seat in the US house. Everything else is either a statewide election, or only affects Utah politics.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Utah feels like one of those slept on states that could go Blue. When I was traveling through SLC, it felt no different to me compared to other big PNW cities.

I’m still half tempted to move there just for how beautiful the towns and views are out there.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

for all the wierdness of mormanism they do seem to embrace the actual message of jesus in terms of kindness. I could totally see maga driving them away.

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is very true. By no means are they perfect and they still stick a bit too hard to voting for any Republican candidate but they do dislike Trump's schtick more than most.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Honestly anyone devout of any religion, even if they are ultraconservative, should be having massive alarm bells as ice not allowing clergy to minister to people being held. Im not sure if that is being done anywhere else besides chicago but its unheard of here and certainly pissing people off.

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

as ice now allowing clergy to minister to people being held

Was this meant to say "not allowing"?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

yes. will edit. I don't like to normally edit my mistakes but in this case its an important distinction.

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very true about the SLC area, but they've done a very good job of keeping the rest of the state pointed in a... different direction.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That makes a lot of sense.

If progressive policy can just be sold to the people in Mormon Church I could see a swing. It’s not like their own internal policies don’t line up pretty one-to-one with progressive goals for helping each other.

The only issue I see is just that they want their followers to be looking at the Mormon Church as the provider, rather than the state. The state could easily subsidize residents, which would in-turn would free up some of the financial burdens of the Mormon Church, but who knows if they could be convinced that it’s a win-win for everyone.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not on MY Watch!

-Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries!

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Schumer has no authority in Utah, he’s in the US Senate.

This is entirely a Utah state issue.