Does not Comply with the LAW? What is she an ACTIVIST JUDGE?
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Basically Antifa leadership
This whole gerrymandering backfiring on Republicans is the gift I need for 2026. Along with GTA VI
gerrymandering backfiring on Republicans
I wouldn't bank on this. The GOP has an enormous institutional advantage via decades of gerrymander going back to the Bush Era. The latest efforts are squeezes at a juiced lemon.
It hasn't backfired. It's the reason the GOP keeps winning House majorities even in years with a Dem turnout advantage.
The thing that's going to fuck them in 2026 is the massive backlash to an unpopular president. But four years after that? The deck remains heavily stacked in their favor. Over the long term, conservatives win.
There's some math here that may work against them. The mechanics behind gerrymandering are such that you give your opponent a couple of safe districts of 15 to 20 points in their favor, and then give yourself a lot more districts that are 7 to 15 points in your favor.
What happens if the whole thing shifts out from under you, and suddenly there's an extra 10 points against you? What happens is you lose almost everything.
The elections held last week were sometimes shifting 20 points in favor of Democrats. If those numbers hold for next year's midterms, Republicans will be absolutely flooded out.
Wisconsin's 2024 state assembly map isn't as gerrymandered as it was, but still pretty gerrymandered. Here's the list of results of that election:
https://www.wpr.org/election-results-2024-state-assembly
If you switch 20 points towards the Democrats across the board, I count that Republicans would end up with 11 seats out of 99. Some of those are even granting them the win on three way races or where they ran uncontested.
This will work very well as long as Democrats don't do anything stupid. Such as caving on the government shutdown. That might be a disaster. Good thing they know to avoid doing that.
What happens if the whole thing shifts out from under you, and suddenly there’s an extra 10 points against you? What happens is you lose almost everything.
You never lose "almost everything" because there are still tons of seats in redder states that Dems consider fully unassailable. Florida, Ohio, and Texas have such a large GOP advantage over such wide territory that they can't make every seat 7-pts even if they try.
From time to time, you get swept in a Blue Wave. And for 2-4 years, the Dems have a House majority built on an anti-Presidential turnout. But as soon as they win the Presidency (as in '08 and '20), the advantage evaporates and the GOP win back all those House seats.
And because the Democratic Party is so packed with corporate turncoats, corrupt shills, and wanna-be celebrities, the majority they secure during a wave year doesn't produce legislation to counter prior Republican majorities. Republicans can slow down liberal reforms on parliamentary procedure and just wait out the Dems until the next conservative wave, at which point the gerrymanders pay their dividend.
If you switch 20 points towards the Democrats across the board
Why stop at 20? Rub your genie lamp and wish bigger. What if Dems get UK Labour scale wins and pull in 400+ House seats in 2026?
It doesn't matter, if the majority the Dems assemble are bottled up with a conserva-Dem leadership, an intractable Senate, and veto-happy Presidency. All you get on these terms is another government shutdown. Exactly what happened in the 1980s under Tip O'Neil and 2018 under Pelosi.