this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
538 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26209 readers
2595 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Ordinary people get one vote. Billionaires get the opportunity to spend as much as they want to elect the candidates they want,” [Senator Bernie] Sanders said, decrying the influence of super PACs that can accept unlimited political donations. “That is the context in which this election is taking place.”

[Alexandria] Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), meanwhile, cast the race as one that “mirrors what we are up against nationally, both an authoritarian criminal presidency, fueled by corruption and bigotry and an ascendant right-wing extremist movement,” as well as the “insufficient, eroded, bygone political establishment, this time in the form of Andrew Cuomo.”

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

tax the rich.... lets see how this plays out.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they can afford to buy Trump gifts, they can afford to pay taxes.

[–] LikeableLime@piefed.social 36 points 2 days ago

Zohran said it best in the debate, they're spending more money to smear him than they would be paying in extra taxes if he won.

[–] Cybersec@piefed.social 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I highly recommend watching AOC’s speech, she was amazing, truly inspirational.

[–] oppy1984 -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only thing I don't like about AOC is her voice, it's like nails on a chalkboard to me. It's worse when she's speaking to a crowd or just really motivated or angry, calm interview tone I can handle, but speeches... nope. I'd vote for her, but I'd just read her statements rather than listen to them.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] oppy1984 4 points 1 day ago

Oh no, I'd listen to her over him any day. Plus I'd actually vote for her, not something I've ever said or will say about him.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Always nice when you can find an excuse to wear the same dress twice

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like they probably would taste nice. Maybe composting them would be better

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

If we can convince them they taste like foie gras, maybe they'll eat themselves...

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Eat* damn autocorrect

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That must have been the most out of place Kathy Hochul has been since that one time she accidentally went to Jamaica, Queens instead of to lunch with a billionaire owner donor at a luxury resort in Jamaica, the country.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I was like Mahndani, yeah! AOC, yeah!, Bernie, fuck yeah! Hochul what the fuck is she lost.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago

Technically, voting has already started.

Go. Cuomo!

Just...go.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it was a pretty damn good and powerful speech.

but also, these events are the least of things politically. they don't really tell you anything new. It felt like a bit of a victory lap.

It's pretty clear Cuomo has not a snowballs chance in hell and also with turnout so far this is going to be a kind of stunning defeat that won't be forgotten any time soon.

I expect plenty to say things along the line of "but that's new york" when it comes to replicating the plays we saw here, and sure there is some of that.

yet to see what this does for other insurgents. polling this week will show if Platner, who is taking the same tack, takes a haircut from tattoo gate. Then you have Abugazalla, fatah, Ruwa romman, many others watching how this unfolded very closely.

the playbook is straight word. Identify a small set of straightforward, understandable issue (rent, transportation, cost of food). Laser focus on them. Stay focused as the hits come.

the outcome of tattoo gate will also be a bit telling. If Platner shakes it off and continues to surge. he was still +30 in polling which was conducted last week after the scandal erupted. it's clear that some people in Maine see this as obviously coming from DNC leadership in Schumer's attempt to tip the scales towards a corporatist. My intuition is that more than anything, Mainers hate the idea that Washington gets to pick their candidate for them, so I think the oppo will have backfired. Schumer might actually be one of the least popular politicians of all time and is a poison pill.

[–] Ancalagon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Schumer is a limp dick. He poisons everything by existing. He speaks and we all wish he would not.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

If I paid the highest tax rate on all my income but we had the type of universal healthcare where I don't have to worry about any bills I just go in and get done what needs to be done and hey maybe gives me cabfare home if I need it. I would be so happy although it would nice to have other social safety nets.