
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I sure would love to see some of the "many black and brown" military members who he claims are casually rocking SS lighting bolt tattoos lol
The tattoo artist I've been going to for the past few years works out of a very liberal town that is maybe an hour from a military base. And the vast majority of her day to day business is fixing tattoos that dumbasses got without understanding them. To the point that she half jokes that she and her partner should hang out at a bar near the base and pretend to be interested in the meatheads until they spot a swastika or other nazi imagery and then freak out.
Basically, they get their "unit tattoo" or whatever because they are in a state of arrested development and just want to fit in with the psychopaths in their unit (at the very least, it is a good way to not wake up to being raped by them "as a joke"). And then, months or years down the line they realize what they actually have on their arms or chests or backs and freak out. But they don't want to risk running into their buddies and having to explain why they hate the men in the foxhole next to them, so they go one town over to where people are mostly getting hot soup tattoos instead.
And while she will very much mock their stupidity and the hilarity of a "300 pound african american white supremacist", she also makes it a point to encourage them to transform it into something that matters to them rather than just get some flash on top of it.
That does all make sense. It's just insane that someone would get a big chest tattoo, literally in the exact spot that Ed Norton had his giant swastika in American History X, and it would be specifically and famously the symbol of the elite Nazi SS group that ran the death camps, and he'd just be utterly clueless about it for years and years. It's just so hard to believe that never in that guys life was he at a pool party or in the gym or whatever, and never once did someone call out his giant tattoo of what is arguably the 3rd most recognizable Nazi symbol behind the swastika and the bolts. I like the guy's platform, and I could forgive getting some tattoo you don't understand as part of a unit thing, it just boggles my mind who this guy's close friends and family must be that they all thought this was perfectly cool as well until he wanted to get elected to something...
I mean... he also apparently stripped down to his underpants in bars when drunk on the regular too (since that is where the footage came from).
Which... okay, he probably actually IS a good candidate for Maine. Like... very large parts of that state are "the parts of upstate New York that still fly confederate flags" if you catch my drift. But there is still zero reason to settle for the nazi 13 months before the general.
Nothing in this article suggests any new evidence. It's literally a "trust me bro" article. wtf?
Ya but it says what we want to hear
So the vibes checks.
Do you think he's lying about having the tattoo already covered with different tattoos?
TBH I don't really care that much for the same reason I didn't care about 1970s Joe Biden fighting desegregation: people can change.
I mean I like this guy's message and he has been in front of this controversy from the start so that's a good sign.
I warn you that sometimes these candidates can 180 on you.
Tulsi Gabard was a left adjacent alternative to Sanders and Warren until she didn't find a path to victory and went to the "I left the left" play book. That one stung quite a bit for me.
John Fetterman was a blue collar pro union candidate until he had a giant stroke and still beat Dr. Oz and after that race has been a conservative in every but his party affiliation.
Kirsten Gillibrand was a strong progressive senator from New York that took over Hilary Clinton's position and eventually became a democratic mouth piece that Schumer and the rest of the party rot has been known for.
The point is that these people have vested interests that don't align with working American's and this guy seems to be genuine which is why CNN and main stream media has had a hate boner for this guy.
That doesn't make him instantly the hero but usually if these outlets are hating someone they are a threat to the establishment.
Use critical thinking and listen to arguments that make sense with research and history.
Tulsi Gabbard was outed as a russian asset really early in her career. I can't find some of the older articles but the allegations have been around for almost a decade now.
She was never Bernie Adjacent. Maybe Jill Stein adjacent. She's the congresswoman version of a Tankie, pretend to be left to make the USA look bad, dive head first into authoritarianism at the first opportunity.
I would be interested in seeing some of those articles, I remember word going around about this and couldn't find any proof other than Hilary Clinton saying she was compromised.
When she was running she was for 90 percent of Bernies policies with the added "no more wars" twist. It's crazy to remember considering where she is now but that was the political path she was going for, along with blowing up Kamala and Pete on stage calling them out for being shit in generally.
Regardless, the point is do your homework when listening to professional liars giving their stump speeches.
The vague details I remember are that she frequently met with and invited to events an actual russian agent.
That seems to track with the fact that Elena Branson donated to her in 2020 and Gabbard hired someone who worked with one of the Kremlin's lawyers in retaliation to Magnitsky Act. Russian news outlets have been favoring her for a very very long time.
More than 8 years ago she claimed to have met directly with Assad of Syria before introducing H.R. 608.
I suspect she was already compromised during her tour with the military.
Say what you will about Hasan, I think his take on the tattoo is spot on. Regardless of whether or not he has or had Nazi sympathies, it shows a just complete incompetence in how the campaign was run and he's just a liability to progressive movements.
If he isn't going to take his campaign itself seriously. How you present yourself and are perceived in public matters and affects your ability to develop coalitions to push through legislation, especially on a national scale as a senator.
If I were a Maine voter, I would hold my nose and vote for him, but the next election cycle, he's got to go unless he really shows some maturity in how he runs a national campaign within the first year. Otherwise, start looking for and pushing a different candidate for the next election cycle.
I’m getting Fetterman from him
Also, funny enough, I apparently blocked this guy on reddit on the account I was using back in 2020
So, odds are, I was calling him a nazi back then too.
Odds are probably not.
Because his entire reddit history for the past decade has been dug up and none of it points to nazi posting. Even posts that were deleted.
You'd think if he was a secret nazi, then maybe it would show in his private online shitposting. When he wasn't running for office, when he didnt have to maintain face... but no, its not there.
Literally, ALL, the evidence this smear campaign has is the tattoo (which he immediately covered). None of his private history for a decade supports this. Instead most of the private reddit posts contradict it.
You think a white supremacist is calling white rural voters a bunch of racists? You think a nazi is posting ACAB?
Bottom line is that I'm skeptical of this guy, but this is my take on his whole deal.
He reminds me of a lot of young, infantry people I've met in my time: young and full of stupid decisions. I genuinely believe that he got a Totenkopf without realizing what it was. That sounds like something an idiot, young infantryman would do. However, I don't for a second believe that he didn't know what it was until recently. That's a bald faced lie for someone who claims to be a student of history. My read of it is that he realized what he had on himself and he was too ashamed to actually do something about it and instead tried to just keep it a secret. That is, he tried to keep it a secret until he was outed for it. If this is the case, he should have just come clean about it when it came out and just said this, but he didn't.
As for everything else, I'll extend him some grace on some (except one) post. Being a trolly edgelord is whatever. Infantry, especially at the time, was very sheltered from the military sexual assault issues, and war is really hard on someone. It can send you to really dark places, especially if that's all you've known. So, apologizing for saying stupid, offensive things and demonstrating change is fine. The one thing I am having a hard time reconciling is the "black people don't tip" post. He's actually defending that, which...is a choice. If he disavowed it saying that it's something he observed but is obviously untrue, then fine, but he didn't.
I don't think he's a closet racist or a closet nazi. I think he might just be kind of dumb. If he's elected, at least he won't furrow his brow and vote with Trump on everything.
Hopefully you aren’t a Maine voter because you’re falling for obvious misdirection and smear tactics. Anything to keep him from talking about healthcare for all or taxes on billionaires.
As an actual Maine voter, I’ll be happy to vote for him in the primary and hopefully the general.
I suggest you go watch when a reporter asked Bernie Sanders about the tattoo and do some reflection about where you get your media and what your priorities are.
Priorities (not ranked) 1. Policy position on unions and living wages, civil rights, all the basics 2. Pac and aipac money. 3. Anti Trump's policies. 3. Integrity based on history of behaviors and current behavior. Especially including sexual misconduct.
Things not a priority.
- Appearance. 2. Gender. 3. . Ethnicity 4.. Insensitive costumes from 20 years ago which were socially acceptable then. 5. Tattoos up for interpretation of some affiliation (no evidence he was affiliated with any Nazi group). .
Keep your priorities straight.
You should vote based on behaviors. Not a skull tattoo that is only subjectively associated with Nazis.
He also clarified the situation.
What more do you want from him?
You want to vote for the person the billionaires and trump and Israel are pushing for instead. ?
Because of a skull tattoo that does not look like any Nazi icons or symbols. But that some say could be related?
Vote based on policy and behavior of candidate. Not on what others say about what type of person they think he is when none even know him.
Lutra
The issue is not the tattoo. It's that for many, his explanation of the tattoo is weak.
Okay, what are his behaviors?
I know, let's judge him on getting a god damned SS skull tattooed on his chest 20 years ago? No? Okay.
Let's judge him based on having confirmed he knows the heritage of said tattoo 5 years ago and STILL not getting it removed? No?
Can we judge him based on actively lying to the people he is trying to convince to vote for him about said tattoo? With the dumbest fucking excuse ever of him being a terminally online military history buff who was completely unaware of the fucking totenkopf? No? Damn, you got some real high standards.
I know! We can judge him based on his long history of homophobic slurs and really shitty views on sexual assault? No? Well, this IS America, women and gays don't matter. Moving on.
OOH OOOH! Can we judge him on having fucking joined Blackwater as a PMC? Still no? Damn.
Okay, fine. Let's judge him based on his long history of community service and political activism. ERROR: FILE NOT FOUND.
Okay, fine. We'll judge him based on a few things he said over the past couple months and a long history of internet shitposting. Platner For President!!!!
What more do you want from him?
Honestly? To acknowledge he lied to his potential constituents and the American people. And to probably step down on this cycle because his very existence undermines every single "trump et al are fucking nazis" campaign.
I would also genuinely love for him to talk about how he was peer pressured into it in the military and that he was too ashamed to stand up. And then I want him to spend the next seven-ish years actually showing he has changed. Get those community service hours. Engage in political activism. Show us he is worth something.
Wait, why did I say seven years? Isn't a senate term six?
You want to vote for the person the billionaires and trump and Israel are pushing for instead. ?
No. I want people to fucking realize it is over a year until the actual election and there is still PLENTY of time to continue this primary. And... maybe they can consider that Smith-Rodriguez was ALSO a veteran who ALSO had a demsoc platform
Literally your only argument is around a tattoo. Seriously. ? You literally have nothing else.
Nothing.
Yup. Nothing other than a guy lying about his two decades of repping the SS. Oh, that and the whole Blackwater mercenary thing. And the lack of any kind of political record. And the homophobic comments. And the shitty stance on sexual assault.
But yeah, aside from all that, we have nothing. I guess he really is all white.
This feels like it is being orchestrated against this guy, if I'm going to be honest.
Does it matter?
Here are the facts:
- He has an SS skull tattooed on his chest
- He got it 20-ish years ago
- He finally covered it up 1-ish week ago
- He insisted he did not know the meaning of it as recently as this week
- He apparently was getting into internet arguments over how he knew the meaning of it and it was not 5 years ago
- Thus, he has known he had a nazi tattoo for at least 5 years
I don't care if it is Emperor Palpatine behind this and Sheev starts giving crotch chops over how he got all of us. I just care about not electing a fucking nazi to the senate under the Democrat flag. Republicans already got that shit on lock.
That’s almost certainly true. And i believe him when he says those tattoos are commonplace, that marines don’t consider the original meaning, and that he knows black & Latino people with them.
But i think, at the very least, not getting it covered up before choosing to run for office demonstrates a staggering lack of political acumen and is a very large indication of a lack of good judgement.
I mean, we don’t give ordinary people a pass if they fly a Confederate flag and say it’s just because they’re from the US South and it’s meaning for them is entirely divorced from slavery. Same thing here, except politicians are supposed to be held to higher standards.
I’d also say that the times the US is finding itself in, with rapidly encroaching fascism, open racism, and the slightly-more-gradual embracing of Nazi symbolism from the current administration, makes it even more important for the left to reject someone with a literal Nazi tattoo - regardless of how they got it and what it may mean to them.
CNN also spoke with an acquaintance of Platner from more than a decade ago who said Platner spoke about his tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol. A second person told CNN that they learned of the tattoo years ago from the acquaintance, who told them that Platner had described it as a Nazi-style design.
Hard working journalists looking for anybody that will protect Susan Collins!