82
DOGE's Plundering of Data Hastens Calls to Tighten Government Privacy Laws
(www.techpolicy.press)
๐ฑ ๐ฑ ๐ฑ
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
82 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
5458 readers
44 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The laws they already disregarded, including security clearance stuff?
Sure, glad to have more. I'm sure it will help next time.
A particularly lethargic kindergarten class woukd be more useful than these assholes.
So what would help?
More than this?A brewery owner printing helpful suggestions on the bottom of caps, a kindergarten teacher prompting their class on 1/4 weekly art days each month to make macaroni pictures about how this is bad, doing YouTube videos of their speeches where their words are replaced with fart noises. Drawing some truly disturbing smut about it, maybe write something for ao3.
Enough?
We would have to restructure the entire ways we organize society. We might need to get rid of government altogether, but maybe we could get away with onlythe immediate cessation of all means testing and unnecessary data gathering, including by police and intelligence agencies. Getting rid of all policing and intelligence agencies would almost certainly be necessary.