0
()
submitted a long while ago by @ to c/@
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 149 points 7 months ago

"Abortion is a matter of conscience and so it's not just something you change based on political gain. But this is something each individual candidate has to try to figure out for themselves and every part of the country is a little bit different," Cornyn said.

Translation: Abortion was never a matter of conscience for the GOP. It has always been about political gain.

[-] burntbutterbiscuits@sh.itjust.works 79 points 7 months ago

Abortion to me isn’t a matter of conscious or morality to me at all. It’s about looking at the facts and making a logical decision based on the current available information.

People who are against abortion rights are in my opinion imbeciles who don’t know how to interpret factual information and believe they have the imperative to make life or death medical decisions for other people.

I don’t give a fuck what your religion says about the morality of other people. People who try to make decisions for other people based on their religion can go sodomize themselves with their religious texts.

The only person’s actions your religious belief gets to dictate is your own.

[-] LudwigvanBeethoven@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

As a Christian, I think like this: who am I tot tell you what values you should have? I have my (Christian) values, you can have yours. Anyone who goes against that is against freedom of religion.

[-] turmacar@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

This shouldn't even be a fringe Christian belief. At least one of Paul's letters at the end of the New Testament explicitly spells out, "don't police other people's behavior", in reference to non-christian practices not being a matter for christians to worry about. It follows pretty directly from "let he who is without sin cast the first stone".

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Yep. Christians are supposed to let the lives they lead be an example for others to follow if they so choose.

Absolutely man, I was raised Christian as well, although that’s one of the broadest categories of religion, could mean just about anything lol… technically I believe voodoo is Christian, and so are the Urantia folks and also the Mormons and Catholics…

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 24 points 7 months ago

Abortion is a medical matter and none of the government's fucking business. Their only arguments are religion based and therefore have no business in government consideration, but these fascists have forgotten their place as 'public servants' and have decided to just roll on like their little insurrection had worked. It's really hard to not say anything to get put on a watch list.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 21 points 7 months ago

Could mean other things. Like that they need to get better at voter suppression and lying to voters about the content of ballot initiatives.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Oh they’re still on it. It’s actually working great. They’ve scored a ton of wins with that shit.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Correct. You know each of these men have some Saucy mistress or a teenage daughter with an active sex life that they had to pay for the abortion of.

You talk to Donald Trump about an abortion bill in 2016 and he's probably gonna tell you "Oh Putin already paid that for me"

I mean I'm not exactly in support of abortion, but it's pretty obvious that the Republican Party are a bunch of heartless monsters and hypocrites

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

I can sympathize with that attitude though. Sometimes in order to get anything you want you have to compromise your morals. I morally align more with the greens on most issues, but I vote democrat holding my tongue where needed because some is better than none.

They believe it’s immoral to allow people to have abortions, but it’s now clear they’re not going to succeed at stopping it, so instead they’re going to focus on the other people they believe it’s immoral not to hurt.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 86 points 7 months ago

But Republicans don't see losses like this, realize they're unpopular, and adjust their ideas to better represent their constituents. Invariably, in the days and weeks following these losses they make pushes to change voting maps to further gerrymander districts, or alter polling places and times, or just screw with the process. Because no matter the rebuke, the problem must be with the voters, it cannot possibly be their policies.

[-] jrbaconcheese@yall.theatl.social 69 points 7 months ago

If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.

—David Frum

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Republicans have always seen elections as a litmus test for the people of america, not a process of American selecting the policies they want enacted.

A republican didn't win, the problem is not with policy, the problem is that the people were wrong to not side with them and opposing parties were wrong to be opposing parties.

I mean hell look at when Pat McCrory lost his re-election campaign in North Carolina because he made hb2, the big bathroom law, the centerpiece of his legacy.

State Congress immediately passed rules saying that the governor of North Carolina had no political power and was mostly just a figurehead, and we had a lot of comments from supporters of McCrory in North Carolina congress saying that although they lost on hb2, "That they still refused to acknowledge wrong as right"

And basically put up a bill saying that we could repeal hb2 as long as we agreed that hb2 was the best idea anyone ever had and we should probably never go against it again.

The person, Roy Cooper, who ousted McCrory was a lawyer who had none of it and basically counted the fucking ways that all of this was not only unconstitutional, but incredibly pathetic

[-] Hairyblue@kbin.social 39 points 7 months ago

I think the only takeaway the Republicans will have is that they allowed many people to vote. Republicans don't like it when people vote.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

For republicans, elections are not a way for Americans to select their representatives or to show support for certain policies. It is a litmus test to see how loyal America is to the GOP.

The idea is that Republican rule is just and noble, and the only allowable outcome. Everything else is a deviation from what is right in the world.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 36 points 7 months ago

It could not happen to a better bunch of traitors.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

I have just the right size violin for these fascist losers:

Lol I love this I also love tardigrades

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Big same! Favourite extreme condition lifeforms for sure 😁

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Noob here, how does one post a picture for a comment as you've done here with your Tardigrade Virtuoso?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Under the big space where you write the text of your comment, there's a row of icons.

The one for uploading a picture looks like two triangles of different size in a square on most apps and an eye with similar background in Jerboa.

Hope that helps 🙂

[-] figjam@midwest.social 19 points 7 months ago

Maybe change your stance on policy? No, its the voters who are wrong!

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 18 points 7 months ago

"We have to have a compelling message that appeals to the suburban voters no question about that," Thune said. "So, I think that's economy, jobs, cost of living, public safety the border. I think those are the issues that really resonate with people across the country and our candidates this year are going to be on offense on that issue."

Except all those suburban voters know that electing you means their precious princess will have to carry her baby to term and ruin her chances at college, so they still won't vote for you.

[-] CaptainPedantic@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Even if we ignore abortion and only look at what Thune is talking about, suburbanites would still be stupid to vote for them.

Economy? Republicans will cut taxes on the super wealthy and screw over everyone.

Jobs? They'll cut regulations that keep me safe at work.

Cost of living? They'll subsidize fossil fuels more, and screw everyone in the long run. They'll probably just lie about everything else.

Public safety? They'll give cops more money so cops continue to be shit while being paid more. And/or they'll toss more people in jail without providing any sort of treatment which will make the whole situation worse.

The border? They'll waste money to build some stupid wall and prevent desperate people from seeking asylum. Plus, the border "situation" does affect the vast majority of Americans.

Unless you're an evil billionaire cackling in your hollowed out volcano, voting Republican is voting against your best interests.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Thoughts and prayers

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I hate that the focus is on an issue that is overwhelmingly unpopular and not on the practical outcomes of the various elections. It's a no brainer that most states will repeal bans on abortion brought about by tricky policies and not wanted by the majority of citizens.

Virginia getting democratic majorities in their state house and senate is a big effect but votes on allowing abortion have zero effect on upcoming policy.

What other effective wins were there? Tell me about major changes that will un-gerry-fuck voting districts because of major seat changes. As it stands it seems like this has only happened in Virginia which is still hamstrung by a republican governor who will veto simple majority laws. The end result is that it is avoiding any real change to the status quo which although better than a continuing drive towards oppressive law is still only a pause to that end.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 0001
0 points (NaN% liked)

0 readers
0 users here now

founded a long while ago