146

A pretty comprehensive video by Hugh Jeffreys covering how Apple has been restricting repairability in their devices, even before 2012.

P.S. Apple's iPhones may be exempt from California's R2R bill, apparently they slipped an exemption in there for "waterproof portable devices" 🤦‍♂️

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Engineer@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Waterproof is the loophole! I had a suspicion Apple backing the bill was too good to be true. I wonder if they'll make all their products waterproof to utilize this loophole, or if they actually will improve for laptops and desktops.

[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Can you share more information? I'm looking at the bill and by means of searching do not find mention of waterproof. Thanks!

[-] Engineer@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

I was just basing on the PS from OPs post text, sorry. I'd ask them?

[-] Quik@infosec.pub 12 points 1 year ago

This could lead to more devices being waterproof xD

[-] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

And then a company comes up with repairable waterproof devices, thus disproving Apple...

[-] Grabthar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Galaxy S5. Waterproof and a replaceable battery. It is easily possible to do better a decade later.

[-] ackzsel@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

They really don't care if some company did.

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 9 points 1 year ago

So either the iPads become more repairable or they become waterproof.

Everything is coming up Millhouse.

[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

OP, can you share more information? I'm looking at the bill and by means of searching do not find mention of waterproof. Thanks!

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

I'm assuming it's buried somewhere, this is the exemption that I believe is related:

Equipment or repair parts as defined in Chapter 28 (commencing with Section 22900) of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=BPC&division=8.&title=&part=&chapter=28.&article=

This very loosely defines industrial/special equipment - I can imagine it would be very easy to a lawyer to make the statement that a waterproof iPhone can fit that category. Something like a Panasonic Toughbook would very easily, and it isn't too far off from an iPhone as far as capabilities and ingress protection are concerned

There are some other ongoing discussions online that are more informed on this issue than I am though.

[-] LemmeeUser1@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That bill has exception for game console. Latest iPhone can play resident evil port. Therefore iPhone is a game console and is exempt.

[-] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I don't mind "waterproof" just not the one mom says we have at home (water resist).

[-] ratzki@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
146 points (98.0% liked)

Right to Repair

1508 readers
5 users here now

Whether it be electronics, automobiles or medical equipment, the manufacturers should not be able to horde “oem” parts, render your stuff useless if you repair it with aftermarket parts, or hide schematics of their products.

I Fix It Repair Manifesto

Summary article from I Fix It

Summary video by Marques Brownlee

Great channel covering and advocating right to repair, Lewis Rossman

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS