this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
412 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29286 readers
2132 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some of these "kids" are older than Charlie Kirk. They were literally all in the same age range and demographic. This is the modern Republican party when you don't include the old people.

Charlie Kirk…. Charlie Kirk…. Oh, little face blood fountain guy!

All in all i feel world is a little better without him in it

[–] Carvex@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How does their age excuse their behavior?

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

It doesn't, but that's the excuse JD Vance is making.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Great now "boys will be boys" is a dog whistle.

it always was for misogyny, but now it might be for fascism too

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Boys will be boys" was always about getting into foolish hijinks. It has been co-opted by shitheads to excuse abhorrent behavior. And every time it happens there needs to be significant pushback from from folks to take it back from the bastards.

sadly it's hard to take back a term.

shitheads missuse the term

normal people then avoid such term

now it's a bad term

any attempt at reclaiming it will be suspicious as if someone just wants an excuse to use that word.

it's mostly a slut thing.

but with slurs it's "easier" to reclaim, as the community affected by it, can choose to use it.

in this case it's different.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it was more of a euphemism for stupidity than a dog whistle for mysogyny.

it's often used to excuse male children or teens (or young men) of misogynistic acts.

although originally meant for general youth stupidity.

it's a good dogwhistle because it comes with plausible deniability.

it depends on the context.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One problem with this defense? The people in the group chat aren’t “kids.” By scanning public records and media reports, Mother Jones determined the ages of eight of the 11 participants in the chat: They appear to range from 24 to 35. Ages for three other participants—Bobby Walker, Michael Bartels, and Rachel Hope—were not publicly available. Bartels declined to comment to Politico, and the outlet could not reach Hope for comment. Walker told Politico parts of the chat “may have been altered, taken out of context, or otherwise manipulated,” adding, “The language is wrong and hurtful, and I sincerely apologize.”

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

“You don’t get it, when I was dropping n-bombs, the context was crucial! It was an ironic hard-r!”

[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Republicans always say “kid” because they always have kids on their minds because they are pedos

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Vance to his credit fucks couches, not kids. He only defends people who fuck kids, like his boss.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Does he fuck kid couches though? Like there's no way this guy doesn't make love to a love seat.

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh shit youre very right, maybe even a chair

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Some of his favorite comedians are stool humpers

[–] balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 5 months ago

Ugh I accidentally got into that section on the hub one time...never again

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

You can vote = not a kid.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

This is just what leaked. The youngish adults staffing all these senators' and representatives' offices are barely any older, and are probably saying the same shit.

[–] EarthshipTechIntern01@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How would it have been better if they were kids? It'd be worse: displaying the kind of bullshit being handed down to the next generation.

They're inept, stupid, racist adults. Pray they don't teach kids to be like themselves (though I'm sure they will).

[–] Honytawk@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago

Kids at least might not be aware how dumb they are. Too many of them just say stuff like that to be edgy.

They aren't aware of the implications that if they want to gas people, other people might want to gas them.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago

I have to disagree. It is definitely worse that these are adults, and they are the upcoming leaders of the GOP.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Open message to Vance:

When you say kid, I think 4 to 10 years old. A tween is 11 or 12 years old. A teen is 13 to 18. Technically, a 19 year old is also a teenager, but they're also a young adult. Nobody older than that gets the 'kid' pass from me.

These people were in their 20s and 30s. They are grown-ass adults who should have responsibilities of grown-ass adults. If you say 'I love Hitler,' at any age, you get another title from me. "Shithead." And that transcends age.

Now fuck off, couch fucker.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

BTW, it's weird how peacefully protesting fascism is being called "terrorism" by these assholes. And they plan on trying to defund anyone and any group that opposes the Confederates, no matter how lawful the groups are.

Meanwhile, they downplay stuff like this.

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

They all looked like pathetic losers, chuds, and incels.

Hopefully they'll go to jail and learn some respect.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

[T]he ages of eight of the 11 participants in the chat: They appear to range from 24 to 35. Ages for three other participants—Bobby Walker, Michael Bartels, and Rachel Hope—were not publicly available.

The oldest appears to be Joe Maligno, who public records suggest is 35. In the chat, he spoke about gas chambers and used a racial slur toward Chinese people.

Annie Kaykaty, New York’s national committee member who, in response to Maligno’s comment about gas chambers, said, “I’m ready to watch people burn now,” is 28. Alex Dwyer, chair of the Kansas Young Republicans, who wrote a series of numbers used by white supremacists and wrote, “Sex is gay,” is 29; Peter Giunta, former chair of the New York State Young Republicans, who referred to Black people as “watermelon people” and “monkeys” and said, at another point, “I love Hitler,” is 31.

Chat member and supposed “kid” Samuel Douglass is a 27-year-old state senator

[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I’m a kid at heart at the ripe age of 69

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Let’s say for the benefit of the doubt this was a chat composed entirely of children. Where did these “children” learn all that talk? As young republicans maybe from older republicans or their Republican parents. Them being actual kids would make it worse

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

And by kid, did "JD" "Vance" mean anyone that is not a boomer or something?