this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
331 points (96.6% liked)

Uplifting News

16765 readers
58 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The 193-member world body approved [September 13] a nonbinding resolution endorsing the “New York Declaration,” which sets out a phased plan to end the nearly 80-year conflict. The vote was 142-10 with 12 abstentions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 74 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the approach that's failing since 80 years surely going to work this time.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was always going to be a one-state solution. I’d hoped that state would be a pluralistic home for the Israelis and Palestinians, but they’re closer than ever to slamming the door tight on a single ethnostate for Jews, with not so much as a disputed territory beside.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

a pluralistic home for the Israelis and Palestinians

Would be a welcome change if diplomatic efforts at least started to attempt a different approach such as this instead of sticking to the same formula that fails since eight decades.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No country can claim to back up a two state solution while providing zero concrete measures if israel refuse to do it

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

Which they will absolutely refuse to do

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

for one thing, Saudi Arabia is bribing the US, though it's questionable whether that'd work

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Qatar bribed trump then allowed israel to bomb qatar

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And Qatar is kinda pissed about that, to be fair. Lack of an apology (as Trump is psychologically incapable of) is not going to help either.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are kinda pissed then what?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Shrug.

Qatar has been quite the friendly mediator though. Any pretense of Trump's ‘wins’ in the Middle East start to disappear if they simply don't do that anymore.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Israel and the usa don't want mediation they want to exterminate palestinians from palestine. I am pretty sure they would be happy if qatar stop doing it so they could day look Qatar is the one who no longer want peace and returning the hostages

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This requires Israel removing Netanyahu and his far right alliance from power, and Palestine building a stable elected government.

Netanyahu might be removed in the next election because Israelis are fed up with his military aggression that has failed to eliminate Hamas or free the remaining hostages. This is an election year.

The Palestinian authority has to be completely dismantled and rebuilt with new elections and authority to properly govern. Abbas is about to enter the 21st year of his 4 year term.

[–] Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

He was removed in 2022 and barely got back in the last election (Current gov was elected with 49.5% of the voters). Plus for the last 2 years, the polls show the gov parties don't have nearly enough support to get reelected.
Problem is there's a high chance they'll interfere with the elections.

And this will have to come with some measures or support for deradicalized education and support for joint Palestinian-Israeli organizations that bring people together like Standing Together, Combatants for Peace, etc.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 25 points 2 weeks ago

IIRC, the UN has held this same vote (with the same result) on a regular basis for decades. This isn’t a new development.

[–] CouldBeBetter@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is already a two state solution. It’s what is happening currently and Israel has systematically chipped away at it for 75 years. They will not stop until they have erased any possibility of a Palestinian state. The solution is one state where everyone has equal rights.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

They have been trying the same shit with Serbia and Albania. Instead of letting us agree on anything, they encourage Albanians to lash out because "we are the bad guys". We could split Kosovo on the Serbian inhabited side and Albanian. But nooo, they feel entitled to an ethnic cleansing, as if that's how it's supposed to work.

We could wipe them off the map before the UN could even react.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is no two-state solution on stolen land.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I doubt mass deporting Israeli Jews will gain much support either, and without that you'd just end up with Jim Crow—the US racial discrimination in spite of the anti-slavery Civil War—where the Israeli majority will just democratically tyrannize the Palestinians like they're doing right now, just without the bombs.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't think there'd be a Jewish majority if Palestinian refugees are granted the right to return from Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, etc.

Also, a lot of Jewish people would outright refuse to live in decolonized Palestine. They'd rather live in Europe than in a country they are forced to share with Palestinians. Without apartheid and a Jewish ethnostate, the Middle East loses a lot of its appeal.

Especially when a lot of them lose their property because it's fucking stolen.

[–] rezad@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Did you know that is the reason my country (Iran) voted no to this resolution?

because Iran backs one state that everyone lives in it and refugees have come back.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

that seems like a big risk to take. alternatively palestinian refugees could choose to just not return because of all the recent horrors and shaky stability. plus, jim crow dominated even black-majority areas.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

I think Palestinians have demonstrated over and over that they are willing to stay on the land even at the risk of their own lives.

Israelis, meanwhile, flee the country whenever things get difficult. Their population growth is negative at the moment.

Also, Jim Crow and the defeat of Reconstruction happened because slave owners weren't imprisoned for their crimes or stripped of their wealth and/or property. They lost their slaves, they didn't lose their land or even their social or political power. They had business relations and could recover. We don't have to make that mistake again. Every war criminal goes to prison and pays reparations, every person on stolen land gets their land seized, then you won't have a similar repeat of Jim Crow.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Two Palestines seems like a lot, but okay

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used to say shit like this out of protest, but people took be literally and villainized me. Glad people recognize a parody nowadays.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I am ashkenazi jewish and i think if the "israelis" want to stay in the holy land, they should be given palestinian citizenship and learn to live alongside their literal cousins. Modern israel is a settler colonial project propped up by the american military industrial compelx and as such will never be an equitable solution.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

I just realized this is uplifting news. Of all the things, who is this delusional to think this is actually good news? They are just mucking around and doing nothing. The UN is dead in my eyes.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The holy land is a myth. We are literally killing people over a 2000 year old myth, it is maddening that in modern society we act like we know what the fuck was going on 2000 years ago and someone somewhere owns it bcz a fucking book says so.. Hell, we dont know what was going on 50 years ago.

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is holy in the same sense that indigenous lands are sacred. And yet there the zionists go, slaughtering the indigenous. Its almost like it was based on Manifest Destiny (it was)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

Great! I'm sure all 0 living Palestinians remaining will be glad to hear that...

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

L. One state solution or nothing. These fucking fools

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Only if its truely secular

load more comments (1 replies)

so if you recognise a two state solution then you recognise palestine's right to defend itself, right? - padme

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There’s basically no way two-state will work anymore, right?

Maybe a few decades ago. But even if Bibi was magically removed for the most pro-Palestine government possible, Israel's war crimes were recognized, and Palestine was rebuilt from rubble with massive aid, it feels like things are ‘written into a corner’ and there is just too much radicalization and spilled blood for two hypothetical states to leave each other alone.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And being under the same state will remove that tension?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No.

I’m not really sure what a good solution is anymore. We hold Israel severely accountable (which is apparently impossible :/), but then what?

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The most plausible path forward I see is the Native American model from the USA.

  1. Genocide and ethnically cleanse the target population into progressively smaller reservations. (Israel is here)

  2. Sign treaties recognizing the target population as a sovereign entity existing within the borders and legal framework of the parent nation.

  3. targeted population demilitarized. It's people become increasingly integrated into the parent nation.

  4. Civil rights movement for members of the targeted population within the parent nation.

  5. Develop an esoteric field of law clarifying what "sovereign entity existing within the borders and legal framework of the parent nation" even means.

  6. Gradually chip away at the targeted population through a combination of progressively narrowing the scope of law covered in (5), and the natural integration of the targeted population into the host population (US is here)

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 2 points 1 week ago

Are the Palestinians at least going to get some casinos in a couple hundred years?

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As long as any Palestinian lives, a two-state solution is possible. We need to support the downfall of fascism, and that must occur by support of Palestina and the downfall of oligarchs.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's so surreal this is referred to as the New York Declaration but the US votes against it. I'm sure there's history there, but I just see the irony on the surface.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

So the UN is gonna execute Netanyahu and his entire cabinet? And oversee the Israli government for the foreseeable future until the state of Palestine is restored and armed equally with Isreal?

That's what's required to make this right

load more comments
view more: next ›