this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
189 points (96.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

14077 readers
661 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mienshao@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You’re conflating passenger and freight rail, so this comparison doesn’t make sense. I know the point you’re making, but there are a fuckton more rail lines in the US now than you realize—they’re just overwhelming for freight rail.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago

I’m 99% sure the lower map is showing freight lines. For instance, there is no passenger service in eastern Oklahoma.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What's the difference in passenger vs freight rail? Rails are rails yo, they can use the same exact tracks.

They just finished opening up a rail through our city that goes all the way from New Orleans Louisiana to Mobile Alabama, which they use for both freight trains and also passenger trains.

[–] wraithcoop@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Freight has priority so passenger has to wait

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nah, not as much as you'd think anyways. They coordinate their schedules pretty well, conveniently for the workers of the companies that need the freight materials to get back and forth to work.

I don't think they're actually using the passenger trains all that much for casual passengers, at least not quite yet. I think at least so far it's mostly to transport workers back and forth to and from work.

But hey, it's something anyways, some level of train progress down this way.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Despite the law being the other way.

[–] lovely_reader@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Rails are indeed rails, but the map is showing lines. So not the physical tracks themselves (although they're necessary to support rail lines of course), but the routes that are actively running trains.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Which networks does this exclude and include? At the very least it appears not to include regional networks, at least in the second image.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 3 months ago

Definitely missing some rail network. I know of lines that were definitely in use but not shown in this map.