For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
.....someone is compiling the garbage right wingers regurgitate on the internet in a book?
Is this going to read like a more politically correct Turner diaries?
This is going to just be utterly pathetic 
right wing intellectual output
Let me stop you right there
On the level plain, simple mounds look like hills; and the imbecile flatness of the present bourgeoisie is to be measured by the altitude of its great intellects.
Ah yes, this great quote by "CuckKiller1488" on pol.
Werner von Braun at least gave humanity a very funny series of videos documenting the many ways one can fuck up making a rocket
If the criterion of judgement is set by the Occident, whether determined through its once dominant faith or its once dominant people, the case against such modernity is perhaps unanswerable.
Prose this tortured has to be either Nick Land or Curtis Yarvin.
Yep--Land!
Xenosystem
Some entity named The Occident that appears to be a collective consciousness and responsible for imposing a strange and alien system called Modernity
IDK guys maybe this is just a SCP-adjacent SciFi collaborative fiction project.
So ya see, if I get an AI to eat all the right wing posts and shit out a book... I can sell it on Amazon. I can't possibly lose any money! 
They asked an AI to come up with a paragraph written by GK Chesterton if he was into NFTs.
God knows (so to speak)
I'm burning this book for using the Lord's name in vain
It's not like anyone is going to read it, they're just going to put it on their bookshelves to virtue signal.
Nazis and Meth, name a more iconic duo
I think anyone who reads this might literally die of idealism
God I’m having a perverse, stick a fork in a light socket to see what happens desire to see what mental gymnastics were required to argue that “modernity” was caused by the number zero existing. Is it a tortured analogy of zero representing what the secret cabal thinks of the traditional man? Is this all some argument for how liberal elites are suppressing this individual’s crypto-math that considers zero non-existent? So many possibilities, all of them so horrible and convoluted.
Quickest way to blame it on brown people
What had to happen to the West for it to become modern?
idk, they just kinda had to will modernity into existence with their epic Western morals and values and Great Man thinking to reach the point where they are now. Or perhaps they've had no choice but to invade more than half the planet, steal land and resources from said land, install colonies and/or client states to facilitate the theft, etc.. Or perhaps the anchoring of "modernity" to "Western" somehow may be, possibly, by some chance, could be deeply rooted in racism in which case not much else had to happen..
I don't know chief, tough question really..
rightwing intellectuallism compiled into a book, so a blank page?
i'm sure this is just my brain going 
at the word "occident" but this reads like a disco elysium thought
"he invented zero, and nothing was never the same again"
*case in point
off to a rolling start
You know it's going to be a great book when the opening paragraph is just chock full of jargon that seems to be getting used in a very specific way and the author doesn't bother to actually give a definition of any of the terms they are using. Especially when they seem to be using said jargon solely because they are big words and therefore it is a very smart and intelligent person who wrote this.
80% of English majors cannot proficiently interpret these paragraphs of great modern literature
Immediately stuck out to me, too. He's using "modern" to mean multiple things interchangeably: 'modern' as in technological progress, modernism as a philosophy (Marxism is modernist lol), and some other thing IDK WTF an "ultra-modernist" is. Maybe a thing that comes after modernism? Like say....a post-modernist? But obviously that's Judeo-Bolshe...I mean "cultural neo-Marxism," so we can't have that.
STEMlords were a mistake.
might sound weird but i do wish someone would do something like this for marxists, ive read a lot of great analysis on twitter and on various substacks and i wish we would all coalesce in one space