this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
35 points (92.7% liked)

Food and Cooking

7068 readers
23 users here now

All things culinary and cooking related. Share food! Share recipes! Share stuff about food, etc.

Subcommunity of Humanities.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] irvinefantasyno@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

give me 6 or get outta my face!

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago

1 or 2. Bacon shouldn't snap if you bend it.

[–] Caketaco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

6, although I prefer mine to be cooked a bit more than that. You people all spoil your tastebuds. The masses that walk this earth have all forgotten the ways of carbon. My stomach is full of ash and soot and as a result I’ve lost tons of weight. It’s an incredible diet. If you don’t have bacon, you can follow along by adding 20 or so minutes to any recipe. More if possible. You can also use your smoke detectors as a make-shift kitchen timer, too. “When you hear the beepin’, it’s time to get eatin’” my mother would always tell me. It was hard to find a carbon-friendly doctor, especially. Every time we would visit, they would have something rude to say. “Nutritional imbalance” this, “this is why you have digestion issues” that, etcetera etcetera. Luckily, after asking our doctor’s office for a new doctor enough times, we were connected with a lovely young man who seems completely apathetic to our diets. One of these days, blackened food will make a comeback, and I’ll be sending “I-told-you-so”s to all of you. You’ll see.

[–] Friendlybirdseggs@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

Pure carbon is tasty

[–] spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm a fan of 4 or 5

for anyone else who likes it crispy-but-not-burnt, the best trick that I've found is to cook it relatively low and slow to start off with, to boil away most of the moisture, and then turning the heat up to get it to the level of golden-brown you want.

there's two variables to play around with. one is the temperature reached by the cooking grease, especially how long it spends in the 140-160 C sweet spot for the Maillard reaction. the other is the final water content once it's done cooking. the former controls level of brownness, the latter is chewy vs. crispy.

in theory, you could get #2 but crispy with an extended low & slow cook, or #5 but still chewy if you preheated leftover grease and then fried it quickly in that.

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Correct. 4 is perfect. Baked in the oven or pan fried?

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I would def do the pan because then you can deglaze the sucs with a little vinegar or something and make a quick pan sauce while your bacon cools, and you can drizzle that over an English muffin, or use it to saute some pre-diced vegetables, beet greens...then you get a clean pan AND a sauce AND you can dig right into the bacon when it all comes together. If you're fast enough you could even chop your veggies while the bacon is cooking. Then the whole process is like 15 minutes

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

Tasty!! I doubt for me it would take 15 minutes, but it sounds like a good use of the bacon crunchies and fat

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I've always microwaved mine.

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Does that cause any issues? I can’t imagine the microwave cleanup to be a walk in the park.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They make bespoke microwave bacon trays with relief and lids. Drain it in a jar while it's still warm, and then a dab of soap and a quick rinse does the job. I was raised with it cooked that way, and it's uniform, unlike pan-fried. No microwave cleanup involved.

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh learn something new every day.

[–] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

My college roommate and I have been at odds about whether bacon should be microwaved since 1997. Now I just taunt him whenever I cook some.

Like, I make it a point to call each time and let him know I'm microwaving bacon. He usually doesn't hang up on me.

[–] inriconus@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Using the microwave is a lot quicker, but two or three sheets of paper towels on a large plate, then the bacon on top of that with a single sheet on top of the bacon will usually keep the grease localized to the plate and makes for easy cleanup.

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Does it turn out as crispy? And would it be like for two minutes?

[–] inriconus@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Depends on the how many slices, wattage of the microwave, and how long it is put in for.

8-10 slices on high for 7-8 minutes, they will come out looking like #2 or #3. Then letting them cool uncovered on the counter, they'll finish cooking themselves from the radiant heat to between #3 or #4.

Once you figure out the general timing for your microwave, then you can get the perfect bacon that you like.

There is also the suggestion from the other reply you got. I never had one of those trays, but for people that I have known that have it, it can work pretty well too. My only issue with them is that it's a single purpose kitchen tool, unlike a plate that can be used for many things besides bacon. Anyway, I'm rambling.

[–] inriconus@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

I replied, but I realized I didn't answer your question. Yes, it can be crispy.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Air fryer at 350 for 10-12 minutes does a pretty good job at crispy bacon, more if it's thick bacon. It gives you time to work on the rest of breakfast without needing to think about it.

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

Good point. I just have a toaster oven but same theory.

I don't eat it anymore but when i did I thought 3 was ideal.

One thing about watching food prep videos on little red note that never ceases to give me a little culture shock is that the preference over in China would be more like a 0 or -1 on this scale. They start using it in eggs and wraps when i would consider it still raw! When they see our 1+ on this scale the XHS users would call it dry or burned.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

I'll need a hundred of each for sampling

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why is bacon that would be considered burnt if it was any other meat considered the norm? I'm genuinely asking because I don't get it.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

Probably because of the high fat content. The fat needs to render properly, which means cooking it more than the meat would otherwise need. If you've ever had a rare steak with a large piece of fat in it, you'll know what that unrendered fat is like.

In addition, the high fat content keeps the meat from being dry, so "overcooking" it doesn't have the same effect as less fatty cuts (this is also why you can slow cook ribs and some other cuts all day, while leaner cuts tend to dry out in a slow cooker).

[–] Friendlybirdseggs@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

Because its thin

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I used to prefer 5 as a kid. Now I prefer 2-3. Only one I wouldn't eat is 6.

[–] Friendlybirdseggs@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

Only one I won't eat is 1

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would like a sampler of 1-5, three each. That is ideal

[–] Friendlybirdseggs@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Chew on it, allow rendered fat to burst forth repeatedly with every bite, coating all 10,000 taste buds, savor it as though it were a piece of gum, suck additional flavor periodically until the piece is sufficiently broken apart, swallow.

😳

[–] Friendlybirdseggs@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You know what? Fine I'll try it

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

Excellent, I hope to hear your review!

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

2-3, anything more just tastes like dry crackly dust

[–] Sh00Fly@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

No. 4

I’ll take two dozen of those, please. Thank you.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago
[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd rather back bacon than this and I'll take a 0 on this chart.

[–] wieson@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

You have all the Ukrainians on your side

[–] Jaxia@startrek.website 3 points 3 days ago

Somewhere in the 3 - 4 range. Crispy but not burnt

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

2,3 or 4 would be my limit. 2 preferable if I'm putting it into a sandwich. 3 or 4 if I'm cooking it up for breakfast or just to eat it like a snack.

when i was in culinary school the best bacon was the burnt pieces at the bottom of the serving pan :3

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 3 days ago
[–] Afflictedlife@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

I will take a pound of all of the above please

[–] RaoulDuke@crust.piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

3-5 are good. Ngl, I’ve still eaten 6 before. I hate remaking bacon. It’s so messy.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

am not a huge fan of bacon but when i do eat it for by itself 2-3 is good. when using in burgers, baguettes etc 4 is optimal but 4±1 is acceptable range in those applications.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 3 days ago

Probably 3. I want it mostly crispy, but if the fat parts are still chewy that's okay.

load more comments
view more: next ›