this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
535 points (97.9% liked)

Games

42423 readers
997 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

I can't decide if the explanation that "our shitty game is made for premium gamers" is more or less absurd than EA charging 80 bucks for a game with most of its characters still locked would "provide players with a sense of pride and accomplishment".

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Eh. I didn’t even finish borderlands 3. won’t bother getting 4

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So anyway, you guys excited for Hades 2?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There aren't enough monster truck owners to support his game. If he gets his wish, Gearbox is going to lose a whole lot of money

The reality is that it is a mass market game. It needs mass market adoption. Currently much of the market is locked out due to performance issues

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Everyone without a 5090 should immediately refund the game and use these remarks as the justification.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MrJ199414@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They toned down the humor, which imo wasn't the problem they needed to write better jokes, and write better villains.

The entire plot feels like an extra long side mission which is basically, "Go Rescue Lilith." They have been teasing something "big" is coming and that they need to prepare for war since the pre sequel. We have gotten now two new main installments, two "tales", and a fucking spin-off since then. Yet they still keep teasing this "big" thing. I wish they'd move the narrative along already.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Once that big thing happens, they can no longer milk the anticipation

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm so sick of bad performance from all the big engines these days. Even unity makes simple 2d games chug.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's just the inherent cost of going with general purpose engines. They'll always perform worse than specialized tech, but modern games are so complicated that custom engines aren't really feasible anymore.

Unreal is the king of bloat. Rather than "general purpose" they strove for "all purpose" - Unreal Engine tries to do literally everything out of the box with as many bells and whistles attached as possible. The result is that Unreal Engine games require tons of optimization to run well, and even the editor itself consumes tens of gigabytes and runs like crap.

Unity is simply a mess of poor decisions and technical debt. Their devs seem to reinvent a crucial development pipeline every few years, give up halfway, then leave both options exposed and expect developers to just automatically know the pitfalls of each. Combined with horrific mismanagement and hostile revenue-seeking, Unity has lost a ton of goodwill over the past few years. It's a major fall from grace for what was once the undisputed king of Indie dev engines.

Godot is tiny, decently performant, and great for simple games, but it's very bare-bones and expects developers to implement their own systems for anything beyond basic rendering, physics, and netcode. Additionally, the core developers have a reputation for being incredibly resistant to making major changes even when a battle-tested pull request for a frequently requested feature is available. Still my personal pick though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] User79185@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You need to have $500 gpu to hit 60fps with 1080p native, this is hilariously bad.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I haven't seen a $500 gpu in near a decade. Even used. If you see a $500 gpu today, I guarantee you it can't run Borderlands 4.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How tf do companies get to say this shit and still be in business?? Are there that many people who just blindly bend over and take it?? Don't people have standards anymore?

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Most of their customers don't listen to them. Not hear and disregard, never listen in the first place. Have no interest in game industry gossip.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

I haven't played more than about 30 minutes of a Borderlands game. But from clips I have seen of all of them over the years, they all look exactly the same. Sounds to me like it's just a poorly optimized game, as is standard for new AAA slop releases.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Only PCVR titles can even approach saying such things without looking like jerks. And even then, it’s probally counter productive.

An example, for those curious, is Microsoft Flight Simulator.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

The problem is Randy.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

This reminds me of the "AAAA" game thing.

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There aren't that many Premium™ Gamers®, and trying to pretend that that is, like, a legitimate target demographic to pander to is just sad, folks.

(The funniest gamer influencer backlash I've seen lately was against some YouTuber who blew ~$2K on gaming desk and a chair and called it a "minimalist" setup. People at large rightfully went "are you shitting me".)

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean minimalism is a style, not your budget

Minimalist != minimal budget

[–] missingno@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

I feel like we've long reached the point where the benefit of top-of-the-line hardware just isn't worth it. IMO, Switch 2 ought to be enough to target, and any game that can't fit on that can probably stand to be scaled back.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Battlefield 6 ran like butter. What’s your excuse

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

When was the last time Randy Pitchford got through a day without being a prick?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Same argument Sony gave when EverQuest 2 launched with stupid high required specs. World of Warcraft launched a month later you could run on any video card from the last 5 years and the whole franchise still hasn't recovered.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Someday, the industry is going to realize that while transistors might still be getting smaller, they aren't getting cheaper for it. Which was the original formulation of Moore's Law; cost of integrated component gets cut in half every x months.

Not just games, but the whole tech industry. Even in so far as faster hardware exists--and it just plain might not in this case--people can't afford it.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

It's more akin to trying to drive a semi truck with a semi truck motor but then something drops and there's a ton of friction like an unintentional tractor pull. Even the best chips on the market display subpar performance.

[–] maxwells_daemon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Ran dis Pitchfork into his mom last night.

That's the highest level argument this guy deserves.

[–] Surp@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately it doesn't matter what any of us say...the damage is done. I saw something like 200k online on steam. Unless most of them refund the negative reviews are meaningless. Pretend it was only 200k on steam and they bought just the "shitty" $70 version. ...who knows how many bought on other platforms as well. They made a lot of money already is all I'm saying and I wish they didn't. Games junk.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›