this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
1507 points (98.0% liked)

People Twitter

8171 readers
2812 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 103 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Not conservative enough? Jesus Christ, who does he want? Satan himself?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 93 points 3 days ago (5 children)

No, Nick Fuentes. Satan is way less far right

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Nazism.

They want a return to Nazism.

Nick Fuentes is where the path Charlie Kirk paved leads.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 44 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Satan is pretty liberal, I mean he didn't subscribe to authoritarian God, he's cool with anyone's sexuality or gender. He's not the one send people to hell because they broke a rule... He was sent there too.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bonus@sh.itjust.works 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Satan's not conservative enough either.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

..... Am i the only one who was hoping to find out what the hell a "groyper" is somewhere in this thread? Sounds like something I don't want in my search history.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 80 points 3 days ago

Funny how the two main shots at fascists were done by fascists. Yes, we're obviously the dangerous party here🤡

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago

So is the right entering a civil war with the right, as prophecized ?

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 24 points 2 days ago

I fucking knew it! I said it before that he was going to be killed by a far right jackass because he wasn't far right enough!

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 62 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Groyper vs TPUSA Gang violence.

Charlie Kirk's last words: "Count or not counting gang violence."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (11 children)

Some really mind bending shit on r/conservative right now. Apparently the guardian posted and retracted some horseshit from a liar claiming to know Robinson and that he was a leftist. Conveniently none of the conservative dipshits noticed the retraction at the top:

Editor’s note: This article was updated on 12 September 2025 to remove quotes after the verified source who attended high school with Tyler Robinson said after publication that they could not accurately remember details of their relationship

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/12/suspect-charlie-kirk-shooting

At least I'm assuming the editor's note means they removed the quotes the conservatives posted. Either that or they posted a fake screenshot.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ileftreddit@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (19 children)

The thing that really got me is that anyone believes the thing about the bullet casings being engraved at all. That’s the kind of detail that’s just too easy to fabricate, and I can’t believe I bought it when they said the United Healthcare killer engraved HIS bullets. There’s no way for any news source to be sure which bullets actually came from the gun; also, wouldn’t evidence like that be kept secret by the police?

I dunno maybe I’m too paranoid, I just believe literally nothing from any media outlet anymore; they’re all owned by Larry Ellison’s kid

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

I just refuse to live in a world where feds came up with the phrase "notices bulges OwO what's this" and thought "yeah if we say the bullets had that written on them, it will demonize the left!"

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

The WSJ said there was stuff written on the bullets, and shortly afterward walked their statements back, so you are right to be skeptical

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›